Ad is loading...
BIBDX vs NAWCX
BIBDX vs NAWCX Comparison
Open Charts BIBDX vs NAWCX
BlackRock Global Dividend Instl
Price$10.95
Change-$0.09 (-0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets908.07M
Voya Global High Dividend Low Vol C
Price$41.02
Change-$0.77 (-1.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets243.47M
BIBDX vs NAWCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIBDX vs. NAWCX commentary
Apr 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIBDX is a Hold and NAWCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BIBDX has more cash in the bank: 908M vs. NAWCX (243M). NAWCX (1.61) and BIBDX (1.55) have matching dividends . BIBDX was incepted earlier than NAWCX: BIBDX (17 years) vs NAWCX (32 years). NAWCX (1.74) is less costly to investors than BIBDX (0.80). NAWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. BIBDX (50.00). NAWCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BIBDX: NAWCX (1000) vs BIBDX (2000000). NAWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.06 vs. BIBDX (-8.10). NAWCX return over 5 years is better than : 61.93 vs. BIBDX (15.23).
| BIBDX | NAWCX | BIBDX / NAWCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.61 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.74 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.615 | -1.376 | 553% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 1000 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 908M | 243M | 374% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.55 | 1.61 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.10 | 4.06 | -200% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.79 | 11.41 | -42% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.23 | 61.93 | 25% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.47 | 57.89 | 20% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...