Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIBDX vs NQGCX
BIBDX vs NQGCX Comparison
Open Charts BIBDX vs NQGCX
BlackRock Global Dividend Instl
Price$12.80
Change+$0.03 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.04B
Nuveen Global Equity Income C
Price$39.85
Change-$0.01 (-0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets144.96M
BIBDX vs NQGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIBDX vs. NQGCX commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIBDX is a Buy and NQGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BIBDX has more cash in the bank: 1.04B vs. NQGCX (145M). BIBDX pays higher dividends than NQGCX: BIBDX (1.29) vs NQGCX (1.22). BIBDX was incepted earlier than NQGCX: BIBDX (17 years) vs NQGCX (16 years). NQGCX (2.02) is less costly to investors than BIBDX (0.80). BIBDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. NQGCX (27.00). NQGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BIBDX: NQGCX (2500) vs BIBDX (2000000). NQGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.61 vs. BIBDX (3.07). NQGCX return over 5 years is better than : 86.86 vs. BIBDX (18.51).
| BIBDX | NQGCX | BIBDX / NQGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.86 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 2.02 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.722 | 16.419 | 47% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 2500 | 80,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.04B | 145M | 716% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.29 | 1.22 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.07 | 19.61 | 16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.11 | 54.36 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.51 | 86.86 | 21% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.93 | 71.17 | 42% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement