BICEF
Price
$66.30
Change
+$3.15 (+4.99%)
Updated
Dec 27 closing price
Capitalization
2.62B
DQWS
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
20.69M
Ad is loading...

BICEF vs DQWS

Header iconBICEF vs DQWS Comparison
Open Charts BICEF vs DQWSBanner chart's image
Bic Stec
Price$66.30
Change+$3.15 (+4.99%)
Volume$1.7K
Capitalization2.62B
Dswiss
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.97K
Capitalization20.69M
BICEF vs DQWS Comparison Chart
Loading...
BICEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DQWS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BICEF vs. DQWS commentary
Jan 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BICEF is a Hold and DQWS is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 20, 2025
Stock price -- (BICEF: $66.30 vs. DQWS: $0.02)
Brand notoriety: BICEF and DQWS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Household/Personal Care industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BICEF: 231% vs. DQWS: 39%
Market capitalization -- BICEF: $2.62B vs. DQWS: $20.69M
BICEF [@Household/Personal Care] is valued at $2.62B. DQWS’s [@Household/Personal Care] market capitalization is $20.69M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Household/Personal Care] industry ranges from $381.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Household/Personal Care] industry is $25.31B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BICEF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileDQWS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BICEF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • DQWS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, DQWS is a better buy in the long-term than BICEF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BICEF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DQWS’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BICEF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • DQWS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BICEF is a better buy in the short-term than DQWS.

Price Growth

BICEF (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while DQWS (@Household/Personal Care) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +1.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.98%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Household/Personal Care (+1.23% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BICEF($2.62B) has a higher market cap than DQWS($20.7M). DQWS has higher P/E ratio than BICEF: DQWS (100.00) vs BICEF (11.35). DQWS YTD gains are higher at: 9.290 vs. BICEF (0.000). BICEF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 432M vs. DQWS (25.4K). BICEF has more cash in the bank: 320M vs. DQWS (155K). DQWS has less debt than BICEF: DQWS (84.4K) vs BICEF (151M). BICEF has higher revenues than DQWS: BICEF (2.04B) vs DQWS (1.67M).
BICEFDQWSBICEF / DQWS
Capitalization2.62B20.7M12,633%
EBITDA432M25.4K1,700,787%
Gain YTD0.0009.290-
P/E Ratio11.35100.0011%
Revenue2.04B1.67M122,496%
Total Cash320M155K206,452%
Total Debt151M84.4K178,910%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BICEF vs DQWS: Fundamental Ratings
BICEF
DQWS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
6621
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5044
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
774
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5030

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BICEF's Valuation (14) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for DQWS (87). This means that BICEF’s stock grew significantly faster than DQWS’s over the last 12 months.

BICEF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as DQWS (100). This means that BICEF’s stock grew similarly to DQWS’s over the last 12 months.

DQWS's SMR Rating (21) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BICEF (66). This means that DQWS’s stock grew somewhat faster than BICEF’s over the last 12 months.

DQWS's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as BICEF (50). This means that DQWS’s stock grew similarly to BICEF’s over the last 12 months.

DQWS's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BICEF (77). This means that DQWS’s stock grew significantly faster than BICEF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BICEFDQWS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
49%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
43%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BICEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DQWS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NULG87.580.79
+0.91%
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF
TRTY25.710.09
+0.34%
Cambria Trinity ETF
BKHY48.170.13
+0.27%
BNY Mellon High Yield ETF
XAUG34.40N/A
N/A
FT Vest U.S. Eq Enh & ModBufETF-Aug
RZC25.95-0.02
-0.08%
Reinsurance Group of America

BICEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BICEF and CAWW have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BICEF and CAWW's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BICEF
1D Price
Change %
BICEF100%
N/A
CAWW - BICEF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BDRFY - BICEF
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.70%
HEGIY - BICEF
-0%
Poorly correlated
+2.40%
HENKY - BICEF
-2%
Poorly correlated
+0.59%
ETTYF - BICEF
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

DQWS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DQWS and BICEY have been poorly correlated (+-1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DQWS and BICEY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DQWS
1D Price
Change %
DQWS100%
N/A
BICEY - DQWS
-1%
Poorly correlated
-0.44%
ETTYF - DQWS
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BDRFF - DQWS
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HEGIY - DQWS
-3%
Poorly correlated
+2.40%
BICEF - DQWS
-5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More