BICEY
Price
$31.59
Change
+$0.34 (+1.09%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
2.6B
CAWW
Price
$0.64
Change
-$0.02 (-3.03%)
Updated
Aug 25 closing price
Capitalization
4.86M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BICEY vs CAWW

Header iconBICEY vs CAWW Comparison
Open Charts BICEY vs CAWWBanner chart's image
BIC SA
Price$31.59
Change+$0.34 (+1.09%)
Volume$8.01K
Capitalization2.6B
CCA Industries
Price$0.64
Change-$0.02 (-3.03%)
Volume$1.48K
Capitalization4.86M
BICEY vs CAWW Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BICEY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CAWW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BICEY vs. CAWW commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BICEY is a Buy and CAWW is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (BICEY: $31.59 vs. CAWW: $0.64)
Brand notoriety: BICEY and CAWW are both not notable
Both companies represent the Household/Personal Care industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BICEY: 62% vs. CAWW: 13%
Market capitalization -- BICEY: $2.6B vs. CAWW: $4.86M
BICEY [@Household/Personal Care] is valued at $2.6B. CAWW’s [@Household/Personal Care] market capitalization is $4.86M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Household/Personal Care] industry ranges from $365.34B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Household/Personal Care] industry is $21.6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BICEY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCAWW’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BICEY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CAWW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BICEY is a better buy in the long-term than CAWW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BICEY’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CAWW’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BICEY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • CAWW’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BICEY is a better buy in the short-term than CAWW.

Price Growth

BICEY (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а +0.35% price change this week, while CAWW (@Household/Personal Care) price change was -1.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +0.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.76%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Household/Personal Care (+0.31% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BICEY($2.6B) has a higher market cap than CAWW($4.86M). BICEY YTD gains are higher at: 8.021 vs. CAWW (7.083). BICEY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 384M vs. CAWW (596K). BICEY has more cash in the bank: 313M vs. CAWW (84.4K). CAWW has less debt than BICEY: CAWW (1.4M) vs BICEY (365M). BICEY has higher revenues than CAWW: BICEY (2.13B) vs CAWW (16.6M).
BICEYCAWWBICEY / CAWW
Capitalization2.6B4.86M53,520%
EBITDA384M596K64,430%
Gain YTD8.0217.083113%
P/E Ratio12.86N/A-
Revenue2.13B16.6M12,855%
Total Cash313M84.4K370,853%
Total Debt365M1.4M26,016%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BICEY vs CAWW: Fundamental Ratings
BICEY
CAWW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1793
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
49100
SMR RATING
1..100
708
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5364
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3798
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BICEY's Valuation (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CAWW (83). This means that BICEY’s stock grew significantly faster than CAWW’s over the last 12 months.

BICEY's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CAWW (100). This means that BICEY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CAWW’s over the last 12 months.

CAWW's SMR Rating (8) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BICEY (70). This means that CAWW’s stock grew somewhat faster than BICEY’s over the last 12 months.

BICEY's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as CAWW (64). This means that BICEY’s stock grew similarly to CAWW’s over the last 12 months.

BICEY's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CAWW (98). This means that BICEY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CAWW’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BICEYCAWW
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
51%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BICEY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CAWW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SUSIX13.560.02
+0.15%
State Street Instl US Equity Inv
FLPSX45.94N/A
N/A
Fidelity Low-Priced Stock
TAGHX33.55N/A
N/A
Transamerica US Growth R6
COSTX12.81N/A
N/A
Columbia Overseas Core Institutional 2
GAFSX19.99N/A
N/A
Gabelli Global Financial Services AAA

BICEY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BICEY and SSDOY have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BICEY and SSDOY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BICEY
1D Price
Change %
BICEY100%
+1.09%
SSDOY - BICEY
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.64%
KAOOY - BICEY
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.89%
HENOY - BICEY
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.31%
LRLCY - BICEY
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.52%
CAWW - BICEY
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CAWW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CAWW and BICEY have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CAWW and BICEY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CAWW
1D Price
Change %
CAWW100%
N/A
BICEY - CAWW
9%
Poorly correlated
+1.09%
BICEF - CAWW
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ETTYF - CAWW
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HEGIY - CAWW
-3%
Poorly correlated
-1.56%
BDRFY - CAWW
-4%
Poorly correlated
+0.26%
More