BICEY
Price
$32.44
Change
-$0.76 (-2.29%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
CAWW
Price
$0.78
Change
-$0.02 (-2.50%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
Ad is loading...

BICEY vs CAWW

Header iconBICEY vs CAWW Comparison
Open Charts BICEY vs CAWWBanner chart's image
BIC SA
Price$32.44
Change-$0.76 (-2.29%)
Volume$2.2K
CapitalizationN/A
CCA Industries
Price$0.78
Change-$0.02 (-2.50%)
Volume$6.3K
CapitalizationN/A
BICEY vs CAWW Comparison Chart
Loading...
BICEY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CAWW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BICEY vs. CAWW commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BICEY is a Buy and CAWW is a StrongSell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (BICEY: $32.44 vs. CAWW: $0.78)
Brand notoriety: BICEY and CAWW are both not notable
Both companies represent the Household/Personal Care industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BICEY: 47% vs. CAWW: 331%
Market capitalization -- BICEY: $2.62B vs. CAWW: $18.79M
BICEY [@Household/Personal Care] is valued at $2.62B. CAWW’s [@Household/Personal Care] market capitalization is $18.79M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Household/Personal Care] industry ranges from $381.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Household/Personal Care] industry is $24.98B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BICEY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCAWW’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BICEY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CAWW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BICEY is a better buy in the long-term than CAWW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BICEY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CAWW’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BICEY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CAWW’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BICEY is a better buy in the short-term than CAWW.

Price Growth

BICEY (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а +0.03% price change this week, while CAWW (@Household/Personal Care) price change was -2.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was -3.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.24%.

Reported Earning Dates

CAWW is expected to report earnings on Oct 17, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Household/Personal Care (-3.48% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BICEY($2.62B) has a higher market cap than CAWW($18.8M). CAWW YTD gains are higher at: 79.310 vs. BICEY (-1.163). BICEY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 416M vs. CAWW (596K). BICEY has higher revenues than CAWW: BICEY (2.23B) vs CAWW (16.6M).
BICEYCAWWBICEY / CAWW
Capitalization2.62B18.8M13,910%
EBITDA416M596K69,799%
Gain YTD-1.16379.310-1%
P/E Ratio11.99N/A-
Revenue2.23B16.6M13,458%
Total CashN/A374K-
Total DebtN/A2.35M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BICEY vs CAWW: Fundamental Ratings
BICEY
CAWW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1788
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
60100
SMR RATING
1..100
658
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5253
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7999
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BICEY's Valuation (14) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CAWW (83). This means that BICEY’s stock grew significantly faster than CAWW’s over the last 12 months.

BICEY's Profit vs Risk Rating (60) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CAWW (100). This means that BICEY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CAWW’s over the last 12 months.

CAWW's SMR Rating (8) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BICEY (65). This means that CAWW’s stock grew somewhat faster than BICEY’s over the last 12 months.

BICEY's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as CAWW (53). This means that BICEY’s stock grew similarly to CAWW’s over the last 12 months.

BICEY's P/E Growth Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as CAWW (99). This means that BICEY’s stock grew similarly to CAWW’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BICEYCAWW
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
55%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BICEY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CAWW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JSPJX19.70N/A
N/A
Jackson Square Large-Cap Growth Inv
MTRBX20.13-0.33
-1.61%
MFS Total Return B
VCGAX33.93-1.04
-2.97%
VALIC Company I Systematic Core Fund
MSJCX15.79-0.61
-3.72%
Morgan Stanley Global Endurance C
HIMDX24.03-0.96
-3.84%
Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Instl

BICEY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BICEY and SSDOY have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BICEY and SSDOY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BICEY
1D Price
Change %
BICEY100%
-2.29%
SSDOY - BICEY
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.98%
KAOOY - BICEY
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.54%
HENOY - BICEY
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.27%
LRLCY - BICEY
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.34%
CAWW - BICEY
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CAWW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CAWW and BICEY have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CAWW and BICEY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CAWW
1D Price
Change %
CAWW100%
N/A
BICEY - CAWW
9%
Poorly correlated
-2.29%
BICEF - CAWW
6%
Poorly correlated
-5.93%
ETTYF - CAWW
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HEGIY - CAWW
-3%
Poorly correlated
-0.60%
BDRFY - CAWW
-4%
Poorly correlated
-2.72%
More