BICEY
Price
$31.53
Change
+$0.52 (+1.68%)
Updated
Jun 4 closing price
Capitalization
2.62B
DQWS
Price
$0.10
Change
+$0.01 (+11.11%)
Updated
Jun 4 closing price
Capitalization
20.69M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BICEY vs DQWS

Header iconBICEY vs DQWS Comparison
Open Charts BICEY vs DQWSBanner chart's image
BIC SA
Price$31.53
Change+$0.52 (+1.68%)
Volume$929
Capitalization2.62B
Dswiss
Price$0.10
Change+$0.01 (+11.11%)
Volume$250
Capitalization20.69M
BICEY vs DQWS Comparison Chart
Loading...
BICEY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BICEY vs. DQWS commentary
Jun 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BICEY is a StrongBuy and DQWS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 06, 2025
Stock price -- (BICEY: $31.53 vs. DQWS: $0.10)
Brand notoriety: BICEY and DQWS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Household/Personal Care industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BICEY: 25% vs. DQWS: 14%
Market capitalization -- BICEY: $2.62B vs. DQWS: $20.69M
BICEY [@Household/Personal Care] is valued at $2.62B. DQWS’s [@Household/Personal Care] market capitalization is $20.69M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Household/Personal Care] industry ranges from $381.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Household/Personal Care] industry is $25.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BICEY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileDQWS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BICEY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • DQWS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, DQWS is a better buy in the long-term than BICEY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BICEY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BICEY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

BICEY (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а +3.10% price change this week, while DQWS (@Household/Personal Care) price change was +12.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +0.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.03%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Household/Personal Care (+0.45% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BICEY($2.62B) has a higher market cap than DQWS($20.7M). DQWS has higher P/E ratio than BICEY: DQWS (100.00) vs BICEY (11.99). DQWS YTD gains are higher at: 440.984 vs. BICEY (1.650). BICEY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 416M vs. DQWS (25.4K). BICEY has higher revenues than DQWS: BICEY (2.23B) vs DQWS (1.67M).
BICEYDQWSBICEY / DQWS
Capitalization2.62B20.7M12,633%
EBITDA416M25.4K1,637,795%
Gain YTD1.650440.9840%
P/E Ratio11.99100.0012%
Revenue2.23B1.67M134,013%
Total CashN/A155K-
Total DebtN/A84.4K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BICEY vs DQWS: Fundamental Ratings
BICEY
DQWS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
336
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
36100
SMR RATING
1..100
8520
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5634
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
871
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BICEY's Valuation (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for DQWS (97). This means that BICEY’s stock grew significantly faster than DQWS’s over the last 12 months.

BICEY's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DQWS (100). This means that BICEY’s stock grew somewhat faster than DQWS’s over the last 12 months.

DQWS's SMR Rating (20) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BICEY (85). This means that DQWS’s stock grew somewhat faster than BICEY’s over the last 12 months.

DQWS's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as BICEY (56). This means that DQWS’s stock grew similarly to BICEY’s over the last 12 months.

DQWS's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BICEY (87). This means that DQWS’s stock grew significantly faster than BICEY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BICEY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BICEY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SFILX14.61N/A
N/A
Schwab Fundamental Intl Sm Eq Idx
ADVGX12.20N/A
N/A
North Square Select Small Cap I
NEMRX21.54N/A
N/A
Neuberger Berman Emerg Mkts Eq R3
AMVGX15.74N/A
N/A
American Century Mid Cap Value R5
FGJMX115.13N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Communication ServicesI

BICEY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BICEY and SSDOY have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BICEY and SSDOY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BICEY
1D Price
Change %
BICEY100%
+1.68%
SSDOY - BICEY
22%
Poorly correlated
+6.25%
KAOOY - BICEY
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.07%
HENOY - BICEY
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.63%
LRLCY - BICEY
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.66%
CAWW - BICEY
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

DQWS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DQWS and BICEY have been poorly correlated (+-1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DQWS and BICEY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DQWS
1D Price
Change %
DQWS100%
+12.50%
BICEY - DQWS
-1%
Poorly correlated
+1.68%
ETTYF - DQWS
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BDRFF - DQWS
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HEGIY - DQWS
-3%
Poorly correlated
+0.29%
BICEF - DQWS
-5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More