BICEY
Price
$30.35
Change
+$1.19 (+4.08%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
2.62B
LRLCY
Price
$82.13
Change
-$0.91 (-1.10%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
250.04B
32 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BICEY vs LRLCY

Header iconBICEY vs LRLCY Comparison
Open Charts BICEY vs LRLCYBanner chart's image
BIC SA
Price$30.35
Change+$1.19 (+4.08%)
Volume$208.94K
Capitalization2.62B
L'Oreal
Price$82.13
Change-$0.91 (-1.10%)
Volume$80.18K
Capitalization250.04B
BICEY vs LRLCY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BICEY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LRLCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BICEY vs. LRLCY commentary
Jun 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BICEY is a StrongBuy and LRLCY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 28, 2025
Stock price -- (BICEY: $30.35 vs. LRLCY: $82.13)
Brand notoriety: BICEY and LRLCY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Household/Personal Care industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BICEY: 1580% vs. LRLCY: 72%
Market capitalization -- BICEY: $2.62B vs. LRLCY: $250.04B
BICEY [@Household/Personal Care] is valued at $2.62B. LRLCY’s [@Household/Personal Care] market capitalization is $250.04B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Household/Personal Care] industry ranges from $381.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Household/Personal Care] industry is $25.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BICEY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLRLCY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BICEY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LRLCY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BICEY is a better buy in the long-term than LRLCY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BICEY’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LRLCY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BICEY’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • LRLCY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BICEY is a better buy in the short-term than LRLCY.

Price Growth

BICEY (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а -2.57% price change this week, while LRLCY (@Household/Personal Care) price change was -3.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +2.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.47%.

Reported Earning Dates

LRLCY is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Household/Personal Care (+2.94% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LRLCY($250B) has a higher market cap than BICEY($2.62B). LRLCY has higher P/E ratio than BICEY: LRLCY (39.06) vs BICEY (11.99). LRLCY YTD gains are higher at: 18.808 vs. BICEY (3.781). LRLCY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 9.22B vs. BICEY (416M). LRLCY has higher revenues than BICEY: LRLCY (38.3B) vs BICEY (2.23B).
BICEYLRLCYBICEY / LRLCY
Capitalization2.62B250B1%
EBITDA416M9.22B5%
Gain YTD3.78118.80820%
P/E Ratio11.9939.0631%
Revenue2.23B38.3B6%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BICEY vs LRLCY: Fundamental Ratings
BICEY
LRLCY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8812
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
53
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3948
SMR RATING
1..100
6996
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5550
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5878
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BICEY's Valuation (10) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LRLCY (53). This means that BICEY’s stock grew somewhat faster than LRLCY’s over the last 12 months.

BICEY's Profit vs Risk Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as LRLCY (48). This means that BICEY’s stock grew similarly to LRLCY’s over the last 12 months.

BICEY's SMR Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as LRLCY (96). This means that BICEY’s stock grew similarly to LRLCY’s over the last 12 months.

LRLCY's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as BICEY (55). This means that LRLCY’s stock grew similarly to BICEY’s over the last 12 months.

BICEY's P/E Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as LRLCY (78). This means that BICEY’s stock grew similarly to LRLCY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BICEYLRLCY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BICEY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LRLCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CGREX9.070.04
+0.40%
Invesco Global Real Estate C
SBQIX14.08N/A
N/A
AmericaFirst Alpha Trends Factor Class I
LAIDX9.32N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett International Value I
FUGAX45.41N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Utilities A
ANOGX22.73N/A
N/A
American Century Small Cap Growth R5

BICEY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BICEY and SSDOY have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BICEY and SSDOY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BICEY
1D Price
Change %
BICEY100%
+4.08%
SSDOY - BICEY
22%
Poorly correlated
+4.06%
KAOOY - BICEY
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.90%
HENOY - BICEY
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.12%
LRLCY - BICEY
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.10%
CAWW - BICEY
9%
Poorly correlated
-9.95%
More

LRLCY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LRLCY has been loosely correlated with BDRFY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LRLCY jumps, then BDRFY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LRLCY
1D Price
Change %
LRLCY100%
-1.10%
BDRFY - LRLCY
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.20%
LRLCF - LRLCY
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.88%
COTY - LRLCY
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.86%
EL - LRLCY
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.90%
HENKY - LRLCY
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.62%
More