Advertisement
BICX vs FMCQF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BICX is a Hold and FMCQF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BICX’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFMCQF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- BICX’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- FMCQF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BICX’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FMCQF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BICX’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 4 bearish.
- FMCQF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
BICX (@Hospital/Nursing Management) experienced а -4.35% price change this week, while FMCQF (@Hospital/Nursing Management) price change was -6.80% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hospital/Nursing Management industry was -2.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.60%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Hospital/Nursing Management (-2.22% weekly)Hospital/Nursing Management companies own and operate health care facilities. Their operations include nursing homes, acute care facilities, retirement centers and outpatient surgery centers. HCA Healthcare Inc., Alcon Inc. and Universal Health Services, Inc. are some major companies in this industry. Technology has been at the forefront of development of advanced solutions, including quicker diagnoses of complex conditions. Investments in new diagnostics, healthcare IoT, and other healthcare technologies continue to gather momentum in this industry.
| BICX | FMCQF | BICX / FMCQF | |
| Capitalization | 8.32M | 13.3B | 0% |
| EBITDA | -3.73M | 3.17B | -0% |
| Gain YTD | 15.789 | 1.417 | 1,114% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 16.24 | - |
| Revenue | 313K | 19.5B | 0% |
| Total Cash | 112K | 1.72B | 0% |
| Total Debt | 2.91M | 11B | 0% |
BICX | FMCQF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 96 | 88 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 89 Overvalued | 8 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 82 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | 64 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | 44 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 18 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FMCQF's Valuation (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BICX (89). This means that FMCQF’s stock grew significantly faster than BICX’s over the last 12 months.
FMCQF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as BICX (100). This means that FMCQF’s stock grew similarly to BICX’s over the last 12 months.
FMCQF's SMR Rating (82) in the null industry is in the same range as BICX (100). This means that FMCQF’s stock grew similarly to BICX’s over the last 12 months.
BICX's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as FMCQF (64). This means that BICX’s stock grew similarly to FMCQF’s over the last 12 months.
FMCQF's P/E Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as BICX (54). This means that FMCQF’s stock grew similarly to BICX’s over the last 12 months.
| BICX | FMCQF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 32% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 37% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 48% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 33% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 45% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 45% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | about 1 month ago 29% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 90% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 48% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 44% |
Advertisement
BICX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BICX and FSNUY have been poorly correlated (+2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BICX and FSNUY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BICX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BICX | 100% | -1.79% | ||
| FSNUY - BICX | 2% Poorly correlated | -2.95% | ||
| EXETF - BICX | 2% Poorly correlated | +1.85% | ||
| OPCH - BICX | 0% Poorly correlated | +0.60% | ||
| FMCQF - BICX | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CCEL - BICX | -1% Poorly correlated | +0.38% | ||
More | ||||
FMCQF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FMCQF has been loosely correlated with DNTCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FMCQF jumps, then DNTCF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FMCQF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FMCQF | 100% | N/A | ||
| DNTCF - FMCQF | 41% Loosely correlated | +0.44% | ||
| FMS - FMCQF | 34% Loosely correlated | -0.30% | ||
| DVA - FMCQF | 33% Loosely correlated | -0.61% | ||
| THC - FMCQF | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.31% | ||
| RMYHY - FMCQF | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||