Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIEMX vs RNWBX
BIEMX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts BIEMX vs RNWBX
William Blair Emerging Mkts Growth R6
Price$15.59
Change+$0.13 (+0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.03B
American Funds New World R2
Price$90.18
Change+$0.57 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.08B
BIEMX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIEMX vs. RNWBX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIEMX is a StrongBuy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 74.1B vs. BIEMX (1.03B). RNWBX (0.13) and BIEMX (0.12) have matching dividends . BIEMX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: BIEMX (20 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than BIEMX (1.06). BIEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than BIEMX: RNWBX (250) vs BIEMX (1000000). BIEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.08 vs. RNWBX (16.11). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 25.99 vs. BIEMX (-6.61).
| BIEMX | RNWBX | BIEMX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.67 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.67 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.106 | 22.610 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.03B | 74.1B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.12 | 0.13 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.08 | 16.11 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.16 | 46.85 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.61 | 25.99 | -25% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.74 | 89.59 | 48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement