Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIEMX vs RNWBX
BIEMX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts BIEMX vs RNWBX
William Blair Emerging Mkts Growth R6
Price$16.08
Change+$0.06 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.08B
American Funds New World R2
Price$91.59
Change+$0.63 (+0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.16B
BIEMX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIEMX vs. RNWBX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIEMX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.2B vs. BIEMX (1.08B). RNWBX pays higher dividends than BIEMX: RNWBX (0.12) vs BIEMX (0.11). BIEMX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: BIEMX (20 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than BIEMX (1.06). BIEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than BIEMX: RNWBX (250) vs BIEMX (1000000). BIEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.36 vs. RNWBX (13.31). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 24.94 vs. BIEMX (-7.59).
| BIEMX | RNWBX | BIEMX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.67 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.67 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.421 | 24.528 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.08B | 75.2B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.11 | 0.12 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.36 | 13.31 | 145% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.95 | 55.50 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.59 | 24.94 | -30% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.39 | 87.47 | 50% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement