It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BIIB’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGILD’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BIIB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GILD’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
BIIB (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) experienced а -2.37% price change this week, while GILD (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) price change was +0.78% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Major industry was -1.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.90%.
BIIB is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2025.
GILD is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2025.
The Major Pharmaceuticals industry includes companies that are involved in various processes of creating drugs to treat/prevent diseases. These companies engage in research, testing and manufacturing, as well as the distribution of pharmaceuticals into markets. Johnson & Johnson, Merck & Co., Inc., Pfizer Inc. and Novartis are among the largest companies in this category.
BIIB | GILD | BIIB / GILD | |
Capitalization | 31.3B | 90.8B | 34% |
EBITDA | 2.04B | 10.5B | 19% |
Gain YTD | -43.398 | 18.940 | -229% |
P/E Ratio | 26.95 | 16.20 | 166% |
Revenue | 9.84B | 27.1B | 36% |
Total Cash | 1.05B | 7.26B | 14% |
Total Debt | 7.34B | 25B | 29% |
BIIB | GILD | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 12 | 45 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 85 Overvalued | 91 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 16 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 66 | 88 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | 21 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 96 | 1 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 26 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BIIB's Valuation (85) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as GILD (91). This means that BIIB’s stock grew similarly to GILD’s over the last 12 months.
GILD's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Biotechnology industry is significantly better than the same rating for BIIB (100). This means that GILD’s stock grew significantly faster than BIIB’s over the last 12 months.
BIIB's SMR Rating (66) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as GILD (88). This means that BIIB’s stock grew similarly to GILD’s over the last 12 months.
GILD's Price Growth Rating (21) in the Biotechnology industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BIIB (65). This means that GILD’s stock grew somewhat faster than BIIB’s over the last 12 months.
GILD's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Biotechnology industry is significantly better than the same rating for BIIB (96). This means that GILD’s stock grew significantly faster than BIIB’s over the last 12 months.
BIIB | GILD | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago64% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago59% | 2 days ago44% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago74% | 2 days ago57% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago74% | 2 days ago42% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago70% | 2 days ago57% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago68% | 2 days ago61% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago54% | 2 days ago60% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago69% | 13 days ago50% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago65% | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago62% | 2 days ago45% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BIIB has been loosely correlated with AMGN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BIIB jumps, then AMGN could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BIIB | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
BIIB | 100% | -0.62% | ||
AMGN - BIIB | 39% Loosely correlated | +0.84% | ||
PFE - BIIB | 33% Poorly correlated | +2.29% | ||
OGN - BIIB | 33% Poorly correlated | +0.97% | ||
NVS - BIIB | 29% Poorly correlated | +0.35% | ||
GILD - BIIB | 28% Poorly correlated | +1.62% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GILD has been loosely correlated with BIIB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GILD jumps, then BIIB could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GILD | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
GILD | 100% | +1.62% | ||
BIIB - GILD | 35% Loosely correlated | -0.62% | ||
JNJ - GILD | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.62% | ||
BMY - GILD | 32% Poorly correlated | +1.83% | ||
PFE - GILD | 27% Poorly correlated | +2.29% | ||
AMGN - GILD | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.84% | ||
More |