BIIB
Price
$131.95
Change
+$3.95 (+3.09%)
Updated
Aug 1 closing price
Capitalization
31.34B
81 days until earnings call
RGEN
Price
$118.91
Change
+$1.84 (+1.57%)
Updated
Aug 1 closing price
Capitalization
10.26B
94 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BIIB vs RGEN

Header iconBIIB vs RGEN Comparison
Open Charts BIIB vs RGENBanner chart's image
Biogen
Price$131.95
Change+$3.95 (+3.09%)
Volume$2.8M
Capitalization31.34B
Repligen
Price$118.91
Change+$1.84 (+1.57%)
Volume$941.49K
Capitalization10.26B
BIIB vs RGEN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BIIB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RGEN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BIIB vs. RGEN commentary
Aug 02, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIIB is a Hold and RGEN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 02, 2025
Stock price -- (BIIB: $131.95 vs. RGEN: $118.91)
Brand notoriety: BIIB: Notable vs. RGEN: Not notable
BIIB represents the Pharmaceuticals: Major, while RGEN is part of the Medical Specialties industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BIIB: 195% vs. RGEN: 116%
Market capitalization -- BIIB: $31.34B vs. RGEN: $10.26B
BIIB [@Pharmaceuticals: Major] is valued at $31.34B. RGEN’s [@Medical Specialties] market capitalization is $10.26B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Major] industry ranges from $739.66B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical Specialties] industry ranges from $3.82T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Major] industry is $86.34B. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical Specialties] industry is $8.67B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BIIB’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRGEN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BIIB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RGEN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RGEN is a better buy in the long-term than BIIB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BIIB’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RGEN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BIIB’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • RGEN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RGEN is a better buy in the short-term than BIIB.

Price Growth

BIIB (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) experienced а +0.33% price change this week, while RGEN (@Medical Specialties) price change was -2.43% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Major industry was +1.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.91%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Specialties industry was -2.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.37%.

Reported Earning Dates

BIIB is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

RGEN is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Major (+1.03% weekly)

The Major Pharmaceuticals industry includes companies that are involved in various processes of creating drugs to treat/prevent diseases. These companies engage in research, testing and manufacturing, as well as the distribution of pharmaceuticals into markets. Johnson & Johnson, Merck & Co., Inc., Pfizer Inc. and Novartis are among the largest companies in this category.

@Medical Specialties (-2.56% weekly)

Medical specialties are companies that make equipment used by the health care industry. Equipment manufactured and distributed by these companies include dialysis machines, blood analysis equipment, surgical equipment, dental instruments, and diagnostic tools, among other items. Large companies typically aim to produce and distribute high-quality products across a broad market spectrum. Smaller firms are more likely to specialize in a particular market segment. Due to the industry’s close association with medical treatments, they typically have low sensitivity to macroeconomic fluctuations. Within this industry, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Plc and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. are some of the companies with multi-billion market capitalizations in the U.S. stock markets.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BIIB($31.3B) has a higher market cap than RGEN($10.3B). RGEN has higher P/E ratio than BIIB: RGEN (247.52) vs BIIB (26.95). BIIB YTD gains are higher at: -13.713 vs. RGEN (-17.389). BIIB has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.04B vs. RGEN (134M). BIIB has more cash in the bank: 1.05B vs. RGEN (751M). RGEN has less debt than BIIB: RGEN (712M) vs BIIB (7.34B). BIIB has higher revenues than RGEN: BIIB (9.84B) vs RGEN (639M).
BIIBRGENBIIB / RGEN
Capitalization31.3B10.3B304%
EBITDA2.04B134M1,521%
Gain YTD-13.713-17.38979%
P/E Ratio26.95247.5211%
Revenue9.84B639M1,539%
Total Cash1.05B751M140%
Total Debt7.34B712M1,031%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BIIB vs RGEN: Fundamental Ratings
BIIB
RGEN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7466
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
94
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
7189
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6282
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
942
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BIIB's Valuation (85) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as RGEN (94). This means that BIIB’s stock grew similarly to RGEN’s over the last 12 months.

BIIB's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as RGEN (100). This means that BIIB’s stock grew similarly to RGEN’s over the last 12 months.

BIIB's SMR Rating (71) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as RGEN (89). This means that BIIB’s stock grew similarly to RGEN’s over the last 12 months.

BIIB's Price Growth Rating (62) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as RGEN (82). This means that BIIB’s stock grew similarly to RGEN’s over the last 12 months.

RGEN's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Biotechnology industry is significantly better than the same rating for BIIB (94). This means that RGEN’s stock grew significantly faster than BIIB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BIIBRGEN
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BIIB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RGEN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MVPL33.05N/A
N/A
Miller Value Ptnrs Leverage ETF
VGSR10.27-0.02
-0.15%
Vert Global Sustainable Real Estate ETF
NOVP28.93-0.07
-0.24%
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - Nov
CVY25.77-0.26
-1.00%
Invesco Zacks Multi-Asset Income ETF
QTEC209.58-4.73
-2.21%
First Trust NASDAQ-100-Tech Sector ETF

BIIB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BIIB has been loosely correlated with PFE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BIIB jumps, then PFE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BIIB
1D Price
Change %
BIIB100%
+3.09%
PFE - BIIB
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.86%
MRK - BIIB
47%
Loosely correlated
-3.01%
AMGN - BIIB
46%
Loosely correlated
-1.49%
NVS - BIIB
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.37%
GILD - BIIB
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.79%
More

RGEN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RGEN has been closely correlated with DHR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RGEN jumps, then DHR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RGEN
1D Price
Change %
RGEN100%
+1.57%
DHR - RGEN
67%
Closely correlated
-0.04%
A - RGEN
65%
Loosely correlated
-1.14%
BIO - RGEN
63%
Loosely correlated
+17.63%
MTD - RGEN
60%
Loosely correlated
-2.95%
TMO - RGEN
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.99%
More