Ad is loading...
BIICX vs FMUFX
BIICX vs FMUFX Comparison
Open Charts BIICX vs FMUFX
BlackRock Multi-Asset Income Instl
Price$9.81
Change-$0.10 (-1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.05B
Federated Hermes Muni and Stock Adv F
Price$13.87
Change-$0.04 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.29B
BIICX vs FMUFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIICX vs. FMUFX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIICX is a Hold and FMUFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BIICX has more cash in the bank: 10B vs. FMUFX (1.29B). BIICX pays higher dividends than FMUFX: BIICX (6.00) vs FMUFX (2.13). BIICX was incepted earlier than FMUFX: BIICX (17 years) vs FMUFX (18 years). FMUFX (1.08) is less costly to investors than BIICX (0.68). BIICX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. FMUFX (23.00). FMUFX has a lower initial minimum investment than BIICX: FMUFX (1500) vs BIICX (2000000). BIICX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.59 vs. FMUFX (0.31). FMUFX return over 5 years is better than : 28.70 vs. BIICX (11.90).
| BIICX | FMUFX | BIICX / FMUFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 0.99 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.08 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.477 | -5.209 | 28% |
| Front Load | N/A | 1% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 1500 | 133,333% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 250 | - |
| Net Assets | 10B | 1.29B | 774% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.00 | 2.13 | 282% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.59 | 0.31 | 1,461% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.87 | 6.46 | 153% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.90 | 28.70 | 41% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.96 | 33.12 | 130% |