Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIL vs PULS
BIL vs PULS Comparison
Open Charts BIL vs PULS
SPDR® Blmbg 1-3 Mth T-Bill ETF
Price$91.50
Change+$0.03 (+0.03%)
Volume$5.86K
Net Assets44.23B
PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF
Price$49.59
Change+$0.02 (+0.04%)
Volume$1.6K
Net Assets11.34B
BIL vs PULS Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIL vs. PULS commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIL is a Hold and PULS is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BIL has more net assets: 44.2B vs. PULS (11.3B). PULS has a higher annual dividend yield than BIL: PULS (2.024) vs BIL (1.768). BIL was incepted earlier than PULS: BIL (18 years) vs PULS (7 years). BIL (0.14) has a lower expense ratio than PULS (0.15).
| BIL | PULS | BIL / PULS | |
| Gain YTD | 1.768 | 2.024 | 87% |
| Net Assets | 44.2B | 11.3B | 391% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.14 | 0.15 | 90% |
| Turnover | N/A | 40.00 | - |
| Yield | 4.68 | 5.27 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| EMNT | 98.43 | N/A | N/A |
| PIMCO Enhanced Short Mtrty Actv ESG ETF | |||
| CHPS | 29.50 | N/A | N/A |
| Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Eq ETF | |||
| NZF | 11.86 | N/A | N/A |
| Nuveen Municipal Credit Income Fund | |||
| SBND | 18.57 | -0.03 | -0.16% |
| Columbia Short Duration Bond ETF | |||
| CFA | 85.99 | -0.14 | -0.16% |
| VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF | |||
PULS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PULS and VZ have been poorly correlated (+2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PULS and VZ's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y