Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIL vs PULS
BIL vs PULS Comparison
Open Charts BIL vs PULS
SPDR® Blmbg 1-3 Mth T-Bill ETF
Price$91.52
Change+$0.02 (+0.02%)
Volume$3.14K
Net Assets41.73B
PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF
Price$49.70
Change+$0.03 (+0.06%)
Volume$1.31K
Net Assets12.4B
BIL vs PULS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIL vs. PULS commentary
Sep 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIL is a Buy and PULS is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BIL has more net assets: 41.7B vs. PULS (12.4B). PULS has a higher annual dividend yield than BIL: PULS (3.431) vs BIL (2.860). BIL was incepted earlier than PULS: BIL (18 years) vs PULS (7 years). BIL (0.14) has a lower expense ratio than PULS (0.15).
| BIL | PULS | BIL / PULS | |
| Gain YTD | 2.860 | 3.431 | 83% |
| Net Assets | 41.7B | 12.4B | 336% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.14 | 0.15 | 90% |
| Turnover | N/A | 40.00 | - |
| Yield | 4.39 | 5.02 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DFVX | 71.97 | 0.74 | +1.03% |
| Dimensional US Large Cap Vector ETF | |||
| EVF | 5.56 | 0.02 | +0.36% |
| Eaton Vance Senior Income Trust | |||
| VEMY | 27.73 | 0.05 | +0.18% |
| Virtus Stone Harbor Emr Mkt Hi Yld BdETF | |||
| SDFI | 35.88 | 0.06 | +0.17% |
| AB Short Duration Income ETF | |||
| MLPX | 60.90 | 0.02 | +0.03% |
| Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | |||
PULS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PULS and VZ have been poorly correlated (+2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PULS and VZ's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y