VZ | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 21 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 14 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 75 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 56 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 29 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 4 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| VZ | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 59% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 47% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 48% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 44% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 44% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 39% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 43% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 48% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 61% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 37% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that PULS and VZ have been poorly correlated (+2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PULS and VZ's prices will move in lockstep.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VZ has been closely correlated with T. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VZ jumps, then T could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VZ | 100% | +1.52% | ||
| T - VZ | 75% Closely correlated | +0.17% | ||
| TMUS - VZ | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.36% | ||
| BCE - VZ | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.09% | ||
| CMCSA - VZ | 35% Loosely correlated | +1.23% | ||
| LBRDA - VZ | 35% Loosely correlated | +2.19% | ||
More | ||||