Ad is loading...
BIMBX vs FASCX
BIMBX vs FASCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIMBX vs. FASCX commentary
May 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIMBX is a Hold and FASCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BIMBX has more cash in the bank: 7.64B vs. FASCX (518M). FASCX pays higher dividends than BIMBX: FASCX (5.25) vs BIMBX (3.95). BIMBX was incepted earlier than FASCX: BIMBX (10 years) vs FASCX (12 years). FASCX (3.53) is less costly to investors than BIMBX (0.93). FASCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 257.70 vs. BIMBX (242.00). FASCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BIMBX: FASCX (1000) vs BIMBX (2000000). BIMBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.23 vs. FASCX (-0.59). BIMBX return over 5 years is better than : 19.86 vs. FASCX (3.97).
| BIMBX | FASCX | BIMBX / FASCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 3.19 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 3.53 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.673 | 0.190 | 1,409% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 1000 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.64B | 518M | 1,475% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.95 | 5.25 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.23 | -0.59 | -1,047% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.53 | 4.84 | 342% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.86 | 3.97 | 501% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 3.30 | - |