Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIMBX vs FASCX
BIMBX vs FASCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIMBX vs. FASCX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIMBX is a Hold and FASCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BIMBX has more cash in the bank: 7.94B vs. FASCX (527M). FASCX pays higher dividends than BIMBX: FASCX (5.05) vs BIMBX (3.95). BIMBX was incepted earlier than FASCX: BIMBX (10 years) vs FASCX (12 years). FASCX (3.53) is less costly to investors than BIMBX (0.93). FASCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 266.59 vs. BIMBX (242.00). FASCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BIMBX: FASCX (1000) vs BIMBX (2000000). FASCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.65 vs. BIMBX (0.87). BIMBX return over 5 years is better than : 18.12 vs. FASCX (3.43).
| BIMBX | FASCX | BIMBX / FASCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 3.19 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 3.53 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.673 | 5.028 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 1000 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.94B | 527M | 1,506% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.95 | 5.05 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.87 | 2.65 | 33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.79 | 10.11 | 186% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.12 | 3.43 | 528% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.19 | 9.38 | 418% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement