Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIMBX vs FSKKX
BIMBX vs FSKKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIMBX vs. FSKKX commentary
Aug 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIMBX is a Hold and FSKKX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BIMBX has more cash in the bank: 7.93B vs. FSKKX (524M). FSKKX pays higher dividends than BIMBX: FSKKX (5.58) vs BIMBX (4.00). BIMBX was incepted earlier than FSKKX: BIMBX (10 years) vs FSKKX (12 years). FSKKX (3.00) is less costly to investors than BIMBX (0.93). FSKKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 266.59 vs. BIMBX (242.00). FSKKX has a lower initial minimum investment than BIMBX: FSKKX (1000) vs BIMBX (2000000). FSKKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.19 vs. BIMBX (1.92). BIMBX return over 5 years is better than : 17.88 vs. FSKKX (5.74).
| BIMBX | FSKKX | BIMBX / FSKKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 2.69 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 3.00 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.970 | 4.587 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 1000 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.93B | 524M | 1,514% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.00 | 5.58 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.92 | 3.19 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.88 | 10.65 | 159% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.88 | 5.74 | 311% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.88 | 15.23 | 262% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers