Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIMBX vs FSLTX
BIMBX vs FSLTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BIMBX has more cash in the bank: 7.84B vs. FSLTX (2.56B). FSLTX (4.00) and BIMBX (4.00) have matching dividends . BIMBX was incepted earlier than FSLTX: BIMBX (10 years) vs FSLTX (3 years). FSLTX (1.72) is less costly to investors than BIMBX (0.93). BIMBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 242.00 vs. FSLTX (106.00). FSLTX has a lower initial minimum investment than BIMBX: FSLTX (0) vs BIMBX (2000000). FSLTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.58 vs. BIMBX (4.48).
| BIMBX | FSLTX | BIMBX / FSLTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.47 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.72 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 3 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.673 | 4.463 | 60% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.84B | 2.56B | 307% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.00 | 4.00 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.48 | 7.58 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.97 | 12.59 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.53 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.36 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement