Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIMBX vs FSLTX
BIMBX vs FSLTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BIMBX has more cash in the bank: 7.94B vs. FSLTX (2.54B). FSLTX (3.97) and BIMBX (3.95) have matching dividends . BIMBX was incepted earlier than FSLTX: BIMBX (10 years) vs FSLTX (3 years). FSLTX (1.81) is less costly to investors than BIMBX (0.93). BIMBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 242.00 vs. FSLTX (109.00). FSLTX has a lower initial minimum investment than BIMBX: FSLTX (0) vs BIMBX (2000000). FSLTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.75 vs. BIMBX (0.96).
| BIMBX | FSLTX | BIMBX / FSLTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.56 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.81 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 3 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.673 | 5.819 | 46% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.94B | 2.54B | 312% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.95 | 3.97 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.96 | 7.75 | 12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.79 | 12.90 | 146% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.12 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.19 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement