Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BINIX vs RERBX
BINIX vs RERBX Comparison
Open Charts BINIX vs RERBX
Baron International Growth Institutional
Price$31.18
Change-$0.15 (-0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.55M
American Funds EUPAC R2
Price$55.95
Change-$0.14 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets133.41B
BINIX vs RERBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BINIX vs. RERBX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BINIX is a Hold and RERBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERBX has more cash in the bank: 133B vs. BINIX (337M). BINIX pays higher dividends than RERBX: BINIX (0.83) vs RERBX (0.45). BINIX was incepted earlier than RERBX: BINIX (16 years) vs RERBX (23 years). RERBX (1.56) is less costly to investors than BINIX (1.04). RERBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. BINIX (24.00). RERBX has a lower initial minimum investment than BINIX: RERBX (250) vs BINIX (1000000). BINIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.48 vs. RERBX (2.97). BINIX return over 5 years is better than : 31.04 vs. RERBX (12.97).
| BINIX | RERBX | BINIX / RERBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.56 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.56 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.729 | 10.030 | 167% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 337M | 133B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.83 | 0.45 | 185% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.48 | 2.97 | 622% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.48 | 21.49 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.04 | 12.97 | 239% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.72 | 14.50 | 453% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers