Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BINIX vs RERBX
BINIX vs RERBX Comparison
Open Charts BINIX vs RERBX
Baron International Growth Institutional
Price$32.19
Change+$0.10 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets344.99M
American Funds EUPAC R2
Price$58.47
Change+$0.30 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets133.49B
BINIX vs RERBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BINIX vs. RERBX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BINIX is a Hold and RERBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERBX has more cash in the bank: 133B vs. BINIX (345M). BINIX pays higher dividends than RERBX: BINIX (0.78) vs RERBX (0.25). BINIX was incepted earlier than RERBX: BINIX (16 years) vs RERBX (23 years). RERBX (1.56) is less costly to investors than BINIX (1.04). RERBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. BINIX (24.00). RERBX has a lower initial minimum investment than BINIX: RERBX (250) vs BINIX (1000000). BINIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.13 vs. RERBX (7.49). BINIX return over 5 years is better than : 23.37 vs. RERBX (7.43).
| BINIX | RERBX | BINIX / RERBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.56 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.56 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.976 | 14.985 | 140% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 345M | 133B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.78 | 0.25 | 318% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.13 | 7.49 | 269% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.55 | 32.33 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.37 | 7.43 | 314% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.94 | 33.45 | 269% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers