Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BINIX vs RERBX
BINIX vs RERBX Comparison
Open Charts BINIX vs RERBX
Baron International Growth Institutional
Price$29.87
Change+$0.03 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets321.33M
American Funds Europacific Growth R2
Price$56.26
Change+$0.06 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets132.29B
BINIX vs RERBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BINIX vs. RERBX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BINIX is a Buy and RERBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERBX has more cash in the bank: 132B vs. BINIX (321M). BINIX pays higher dividends than RERBX: BINIX (0.96) vs RERBX (0.47). BINIX was incepted earlier than RERBX: BINIX (16 years) vs RERBX (23 years). RERBX (1.56) is less costly to investors than BINIX (1.04). RERBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. BINIX (24.00). RERBX has a lower initial minimum investment than BINIX: RERBX (250) vs BINIX (1000000). BINIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.71 vs. RERBX (0.01). BINIX return over 5 years is better than : 37.70 vs. RERBX (25.08).
| BINIX | RERBX | BINIX / RERBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.56 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.56 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.177 | 10.639 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 321M | 132B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 0.47 | 204% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.71 | 0.01 | 142,172% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.62 | 15.61 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.70 | 25.08 | 150% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.25 | 13.91 | 397% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement