Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BINIX vs RERCX
BINIX vs RERCX Comparison
Open Charts BINIX vs RERCX
Baron International Growth Institutional
Price$31.18
Change-$0.15 (-0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.55M
American Funds EUPAC R3
Price$57.56
Change-$0.15 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets133.41B
BINIX vs RERCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BINIX vs. RERCX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BINIX is a Hold and RERCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERCX has more cash in the bank: 133B vs. BINIX (337M). BINIX pays higher dividends than RERCX: BINIX (0.83) vs RERCX (0.78). BINIX was incepted earlier than RERCX: BINIX (16 years) vs RERCX (23 years). RERCX (1.12) is less costly to investors than BINIX (1.04). RERCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. BINIX (24.00). RERCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BINIX: RERCX (250) vs BINIX (1000000). BINIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.48 vs. RERCX (3.59). BINIX return over 5 years is better than : 31.04 vs. RERCX (15.68).
| BINIX | RERCX | BINIX / RERCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.12 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.12 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.729 | 10.353 | 162% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 337M | 133B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.83 | 0.78 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.48 | 3.59 | 514% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.48 | 23.13 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.04 | 15.68 | 198% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.72 | 17.89 | 367% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers