Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BINIX vs RERCX
BINIX vs RERCX Comparison
Open Charts BINIX vs RERCX
Baron International Growth Institutional
Price$34.20
Change+$0.11 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets371.85M
American Funds EUPAC R3
Price$63.53
Change-$0.08 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets138.77B
BINIX vs RERCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BINIX vs. RERCX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BINIX is a Hold and RERCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERCX has more cash in the bank: 139B vs. BINIX (372M). BINIX pays higher dividends than RERCX: BINIX (0.66) vs RERCX (0.47). BINIX was incepted earlier than RERCX: BINIX (16 years) vs RERCX (23 years). RERCX (1.12) is less costly to investors than BINIX (1.04). RERCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. BINIX (24.00). RERCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BINIX: RERCX (250) vs BINIX (1000000). BINIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.56 vs. RERCX (10.46). BINIX return over 5 years is better than : 26.86 vs. RERCX (13.58).
| BINIX | RERCX | BINIX / RERCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.12 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.12 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.411 | 21.798 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 372M | 139B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 0.47 | 139% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.56 | 10.46 | 197% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.08 | 49.23 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.86 | 13.58 | 198% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.66 | 41.20 | 232% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement