Ad is loading...
BINIX vs RERCX
BINIX vs RERCX Comparison
Open Charts BINIX vs RERCX
Baron International Growth Institutional
Price$26.63
Change-$0.70 (-2.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets323.77M
American Funds Europacific Growth R3
Price$52.47
Change-$1.52 (-2.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets125.35B
BINIX vs RERCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BINIX vs. RERCX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BINIX is a Buy and RERCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERCX has more cash in the bank: 125B vs. BINIX (324M). BINIX pays higher dividends than RERCX: BINIX (1.02) vs RERCX (0.85). BINIX was incepted earlier than RERCX: BINIX (16 years) vs RERCX (23 years). RERCX (1.12) is less costly to investors than BINIX (0.98). BINIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.76 vs. RERCX (30.00). RERCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BINIX: RERCX (250) vs BINIX (1000000). BINIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.84 vs. RERCX (-7.24). BINIX return over 5 years is better than : 51.78 vs. RERCX (34.70).
| BINIX | RERCX | BINIX / RERCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.12 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.12 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.826 | 0.594 | 307% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 324M | 125B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 0.85 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.84 | -7.24 | -67% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.18 | -5.24 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.78 | 34.70 | 149% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.32 | 8.95 | 562% |