Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BINSX vs RERGX
BINSX vs RERGX Comparison
Open Charts BINSX vs RERGX
Baillie Gifford International Alpha I
Price$15.29
Change+$0.09 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.25B
American Funds EUPAC R6
Price$62.55
Change+$0.36 (+0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets135.22B
BINSX vs RERGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BINSX vs. RERGX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BINSX is a StrongBuy and RERGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERGX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. BINSX (2.25B). RERGX pays higher dividends than BINSX: RERGX (0.96) vs BINSX (0.55). BINSX was incepted earlier than RERGX: BINSX (8 years) vs RERGX (16 years). BINSX (0.68) is less costly to investors than RERGX (0.47). RERGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. BINSX (20.00). BINSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERGX: BINSX (0) vs RERGX (250). BINSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.55 vs. RERGX (8.63). RERGX return over 5 years is better than : 14.33 vs. BINSX (7.54).
| BINSX | RERGX | BINSX / RERGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.47 | 145% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.47 | 145% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.288 | 16.437 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.25B | 135B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 0.96 | 58% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.55 | 8.63 | 145% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.20 | 25.74 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.54 | 14.33 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 34.14 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement