Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BINV vs FNDF
BINV vs FNDF Comparison
Open Charts BINV vs FNDF
Brandes International ETF
Price$35.74
Change-$0.05 (-0.14%)
Volume$29.17K
Net Assets252.4M
Schwab Fundamental International Eq ETF
Price$39.90
Change-$0.46 (-1.14%)
Volume$1.38M
Net Assets16.47B
BINV vs FNDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BINV vs. FNDF commentary
Aug 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BINV is a Hold and FNDF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNDF has more net assets: 16.5B vs. BINV (252M). BINV (21.555) and FNDF (20.795) have matching annual dividend yield . BINV was incepted earlier than FNDF: BINV (2 years) vs FNDF (12 years). FNDF (0.25) has a lower expense ratio than BINV (0.70). FNDF has a higher turnover BINV (10.00) vs BINV (10.00).
| BINV | FNDF | BINV / FNDF | |
| Gain YTD | 21.555 | 20.795 | 104% |
| Net Assets | 252M | 16.5B | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.25 | 280% |
| Turnover | 10.00 | 12.00 | 83% |
| Yield | 1.87 | 3.06 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 12 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BINV | FNDF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 87% | 11 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 72% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BINV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BINV has been closely correlated with SAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BINV jumps, then SAN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BINV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BINV | 100% | -0.15% | ||
| SAN - BINV | 69% Closely correlated | -2.44% | ||
| BCS - BINV | 64% Loosely correlated | -2.65% | ||
| BNPQY - BINV | 62% Loosely correlated | -2.76% | ||
| SAP - BINV | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.29% | ||
| TTE - BINV | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.65% | ||
More | ||||
FNDF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNDF has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNDF jumps, then STM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDF | 100% | -1.14% | ||
| STM - FNDF | 75% Closely correlated | -1.45% | ||
| BNT - FNDF | 74% Closely correlated | -2.39% | ||
| BN - FNDF | 72% Closely correlated | -2.57% | ||
| BAM - FNDF | 72% Closely correlated | -3.02% | ||
| BHP - FNDF | 70% Closely correlated | +0.12% | ||
More | ||||