Advertisement
BIO vs CYDX
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIO is a StrongBuy and CYDX is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BIO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCYDX’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- BIO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- CYDX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BIO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CYDX’s TA Score has 0 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BIO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- CYDX’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
BIO (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а -5.61% price change this week, while CYDX (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was -6.84% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -1.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.80%.
Reported Earning Dates
BIO is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Medical/Nursing Services (-1.74% weekly)The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
| BIO | CYDX | BIO / CYDX | |
| Capitalization | 7.39B | 1.23M | 600,406% |
| EBITDA | 656M | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -17.686 | 54.405 | -33% |
| P/E Ratio | 24.38 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 2.55B | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 1.37B | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 1.41B | N/A | - |
BIO | CYDX | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 52 | 99 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 82 Overvalued | 33 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 86 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CYDX's Valuation (33) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BIO (82) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that CYDX’s stock grew somewhat faster than BIO’s over the last 12 months.
CYDX's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as BIO (100) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that CYDX’s stock grew similarly to BIO’s over the last 12 months.
BIO's SMR Rating (86) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as CYDX (100) in the null industry. This means that BIO’s stock grew similarly to CYDX’s over the last 12 months.
CYDX's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as BIO (56) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that CYDX’s stock grew similarly to BIO’s over the last 12 months.
BIO's P/E Growth Rating (52) in the Medical Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CYDX (100) in the null industry. This means that BIO’s stock grew somewhat faster than CYDX’s over the last 12 months.
| BIO | CYDX | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 56% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 40% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 49% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 35% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 22 days ago 70% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | N/A |
Advertisement
CYDX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CYDX and INMD have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CYDX and INMD's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CYDX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CYDX | 100% | N/A | ||
| INMD - CYDX | 23% Poorly correlated | -1.14% | ||
| BIO - CYDX | 20% Poorly correlated | -2.24% | ||
| SOAGY - CYDX | 15% Poorly correlated | -4.19% | ||
| MASS - CYDX | 8% Poorly correlated | +8.73% | ||
| LUDG - CYDX | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||