Ad is loading...
BIOPX vs GFACX
BIOPX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts BIOPX vs GFACX
Baron Opportunity Retail
Price$39.49
Change-$0.09 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.35B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$56.58
Change+$0.04 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets261.04B
BIOPX vs GFACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIOPX vs. GFACX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIOPX is a Hold and GFACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 261B vs. BIOPX (1.35B). BIOPX (0.00) and GFACX (0.00) have matching dividends . BIOPX was incepted earlier than GFACX: BIOPX (25 years) vs GFACX (24 years). GFACX (1.36) and BIOPX (1.31) have similar cost to investors . GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. BIOPX (23.29). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than BIOPX: GFACX (250) vs BIOPX (2000). BIOPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.23 vs. GFACX (-4.76). BIOPX return over 5 years is better than : 65.75 vs. GFACX (27.92).
| BIOPX | GFACX | BIOPX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.36 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.36 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -16.020 | -11.261 | 142% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.35B | 261B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.23 | -4.76 | -68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.47 | 0.62 | 3,931% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.75 | 27.92 | 235% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.39 | 32.91 | 314% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...