Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIOPX vs GFACX
BIOPX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts BIOPX vs GFACX
Baron Opportunity Retail
Price$52.66
Change+$0.35 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.65B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$71.94
Change+$0.24 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.05B
BIOPX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIOPX vs. GFACX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIOPX is a StrongBuy and GFACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. BIOPX (1.65B). BIOPX (0.00) and GFACX (0.00) have matching dividends . BIOPX was incepted earlier than GFACX: BIOPX (25 years) vs GFACX (24 years). GFACX (1.36) and BIOPX (1.31) have similar cost to investors . BIOPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than BIOPX: GFACX (250) vs BIOPX (2000). BIOPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.63 vs. GFACX (15.45). BIOPX return over 5 years is better than : 70.09 vs. GFACX (38.85).
| BIOPX | GFACX | BIOPX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.36 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.36 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.733 | 12.829 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.65B | 327B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.63 | 15.45 | 185% |
| Returns for 3 years | 102.38 | 51.55 | 199% |
| Returns for 5 years | 70.09 | 38.85 | 180% |
| Returns for 10 years | 167.58 | 67.89 | 247% |