Ad is loading...
BIOPX vs GFAFX
BIOPX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts BIOPX vs GFAFX
Baron Opportunity Retail
Price$39.49
Change-$0.09 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.35B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$65.59
Change+$0.05 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets261.04B
BIOPX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIOPX vs. GFAFX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIOPX is a Hold and GFAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 261B vs. BIOPX (1.35B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than BIOPX: GFAFX (0.35) vs BIOPX (0.00). BIOPX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: BIOPX (25 years) vs GFAFX (24 years). BIOPX (1.31) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. BIOPX (23.29). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than BIOPX: GFAFX (250) vs BIOPX (2000). BIOPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.23 vs. GFAFX (-2.92). BIOPX return over 5 years is better than : 65.75 vs. GFAFX (37.08).
| BIOPX | GFAFX | BIOPX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.67 | 196% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.67 | 196% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -16.020 | -11.076 | 145% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.35B | 261B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.35 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.23 | -2.92 | -111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.47 | 5.17 | 474% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.75 | 37.08 | 177% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.39 | 47.66 | 217% |