Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIOPX vs GFAFX
BIOPX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts BIOPX vs GFAFX
Baron Opportunity Retail
Price$52.14
Change+$0.10 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.71B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$84.28
Change-$0.05 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
BIOPX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIOPX vs. GFAFX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIOPX is a Buy and GFAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. BIOPX (1.71B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than BIOPX: GFAFX (0.30) vs BIOPX (0.00). BIOPX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: BIOPX (25 years) vs GFAFX (24 years). BIOPX (1.31) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). BIOPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than BIOPX: GFAFX (250) vs BIOPX (2000). BIOPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.79 vs. GFAFX (14.63). BIOPX return over 5 years is better than : 61.32 vs. GFAFX (44.21).
| BIOPX | GFAFX | BIOPX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.67 | 196% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.67 | 196% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.630 | 14.262 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.71B | 329B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.30 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.79 | 14.63 | 163% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.45 | 42.59 | 165% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.32 | 44.21 | 139% |
| Returns for 10 years | 172.13 | 87.27 | 197% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement