Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIOPX vs GFAFX
BIOPX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts BIOPX vs GFAFX
Baron Opportunity Retail
Price$54.13
Change-$0.54 (-0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.78B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$87.75
Change-$0.57 (-0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets342.85B
BIOPX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIOPX vs. GFAFX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIOPX is a Buy and GFAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 343B vs. BIOPX (1.78B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than BIOPX: GFAFX (0.29) vs BIOPX (0.00). BIOPX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: BIOPX (26 years) vs GFAFX (25 years). BIOPX (1.31) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). BIOPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than BIOPX: GFAFX (250) vs BIOPX (2000). BIOPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.70 vs. GFAFX (15.06). BIOPX return over 5 years is better than : 48.91 vs. GFAFX (42.85).
| BIOPX | GFAFX | BIOPX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.67 | 196% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.67 | 196% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.850 | 18.967 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.78B | 343B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.29 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.70 | 15.06 | 157% |
| Returns for 3 years | 116.26 | 74.70 | 156% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.91 | 42.85 | 114% |
| Returns for 10 years | 204.61 | 103.69 | 197% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement