Ad is loading...
BIOPX vs GFAFX
BIOPX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts BIOPX vs GFAFX
Baron Opportunity Retail
Price$44.30
Change+$0.29 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.38B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$71.96
Change+$0.53 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets283.8B
BIOPX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIOPX vs. GFAFX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIOPX is a Buy and GFAFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 284B vs. BIOPX (1.38B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than BIOPX: GFAFX (0.35) vs BIOPX (0.00). BIOPX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: BIOPX (25 years) vs GFAFX (24 years). BIOPX (1.31) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. BIOPX (23.29). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than BIOPX: GFAFX (250) vs BIOPX (2000). BIOPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.99 vs. GFAFX (3.57). BIOPX return over 5 years is better than : 71.58 vs. GFAFX (44.32).
| BIOPX | GFAFX | BIOPX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.67 | 196% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.67 | 196% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.620 | -2.440 | 271% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.38B | 284B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.35 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.99 | 3.57 | 364% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.38 | 34.10 | 209% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.58 | 44.32 | 162% |
| Returns for 10 years | 129.70 | 61.32 | 212% |