Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIOPX vs RGACX
BIOPX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts BIOPX vs RGACX
Baron Opportunity Retail
Price$51.09
Change+$0.20 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.54B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$79.34
Change+$0.41 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets319.43B
BIOPX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIOPX vs. RGACX commentary
Jul 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIOPX is a StrongBuy and RGACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 319B vs. BIOPX (1.54B). RGACX pays higher dividends than BIOPX: RGACX (0.08) vs BIOPX (0.00). BIOPX was incepted earlier than RGACX: BIOPX (25 years) vs RGACX (23 years). BIOPX (1.31) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). BIOPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than BIOPX: RGACX (250) vs BIOPX (2000). BIOPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.94 vs. RGACX (10.60). BIOPX return over 5 years is better than : 68.01 vs. RGACX (46.03).
| BIOPX | RGACX | BIOPX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.94 | 139% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.94 | 139% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.978 | 9.640 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.54B | 319B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.08 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.94 | 10.60 | 188% |
| Returns for 3 years | 98.48 | 56.16 | 175% |
| Returns for 5 years | 68.01 | 46.03 | 148% |
| Returns for 10 years | 161.38 | 79.39 | 203% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement