BIPC
Price
$40.70
Change
-$0.23 (-0.56%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
4.74B
CGHLY
Price
$21.04
Change
-$1.42 (-6.32%)
Updated
May 7 closing price
Capitalization
6.06B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BIPC vs CGHLY

Header iconBIPC vs CGHLY Comparison
Open Charts BIPC vs CGHLYBanner chart's image
Brookfield Infrastructure
Price$40.70
Change-$0.23 (-0.56%)
Volume$642.42K
Capitalization4.74B
China Gas Holdings
Price$21.04
Change-$1.42 (-6.32%)
Volume$153
Capitalization6.06B
BIPC vs CGHLY Comparison Chart
Loading...
BIPC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BIPC vs. CGHLY commentary
Jun 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIPC is a StrongBuy and CGHLY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 07, 2025
Stock price -- (BIPC: $40.70 vs. CGHLY: $21.04)
Brand notoriety: BIPC and CGHLY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Gas Distributors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BIPC: 88% vs. CGHLY: 50%
Market capitalization -- BIPC: $4.74B vs. CGHLY: $6.06B
BIPC [@Gas Distributors] is valued at $4.74B. CGHLY’s [@Gas Distributors] market capitalization is $6.06B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Gas Distributors] industry ranges from $29.64B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Gas Distributors] industry is $8.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BIPC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCGHLY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BIPC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CGHLY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BIPC is a better buy in the long-term than CGHLY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BIPC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BIPC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

BIPC (@Gas Distributors) experienced а +2.86% price change this week, while CGHLY (@Gas Distributors) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Gas Distributors industry was -0.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.62%.

Reported Earning Dates

BIPC is expected to report earnings on May 09, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Gas Distributors (-0.42% weekly)

Gas distributors are involved in moving and selling gas – from wellheads or over-distribution systems operated by other firms – to residential and non-residential customers. These companies perform tasks such as the gathering and processing of gas, intrastate and interstate transport, and delivery to the customer. Some of the biggest gas distributing companies in the U.S. include Sempra Energy, Avangrid Inc and Atmos Energy Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGHLY($6.06B) has a higher market cap than BIPC($4.74B). BIPC has higher P/E ratio than CGHLY: BIPC (42.35) vs CGHLY (10.80). BIPC YTD gains are higher at: 3.962 vs. CGHLY (-0.314). CGHLY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 11B vs. BIPC (2.04B). CGHLY has more cash in the bank: 13.9B vs. BIPC (539M). BIPC has less debt than CGHLY: BIPC (12.1B) vs CGHLY (60.1B). CGHLY has higher revenues than BIPC: CGHLY (92.3B) vs BIPC (2.5B).
BIPCCGHLYBIPC / CGHLY
Capitalization4.74B6.06B78%
EBITDA2.04B11B19%
Gain YTD3.962-0.314-1,261%
P/E Ratio42.3510.80392%
Revenue2.5B92.3B3%
Total Cash539M13.9B4%
Total Debt12.1B60.1B20%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CGHLY: Fundamental Ratings
CGHLY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
35
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
58
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
73
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BIPC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BIPC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RGLHX25.770.12
+0.47%
American Funds Global Insight R-2E
IGISX18.96N/A
N/A
Voya Growth and Income Port S2
PSIFX44.63N/A
N/A
PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Index Z
PAGHX103.63N/A
N/A
Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth C
HGXVX16.33N/A
N/A
Hartford Global Impact R6

BIPC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BIPC has been loosely correlated with NWN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BIPC jumps, then NWN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BIPC
1D Price
Change %
BIPC100%
-0.56%
NWN - BIPC
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.28%
SWX - BIPC
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.55%
SR - BIPC
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.04%
CPK - BIPC
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.63%
NJR - BIPC
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.16%
More

CGHLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CGHLY and XNGSY have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CGHLY and XNGSY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CGHLY
1D Price
Change %
CGHLY100%
N/A
XNGSY - CGHLY
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.58%
XNGSF - CGHLY
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
APAJF - CGHLY
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BIPC - CGHLY
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.56%
NI - CGHLY
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.74%
More