Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIPIX vs RMQAX
BIPIX vs RMQAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIPIX vs. RMQAX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIPIX is a Hold and RMQAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMQAX has more cash in the bank: 467M vs. BIPIX (94M). RMQAX pays higher dividends than BIPIX: RMQAX (0.19) vs BIPIX (0.14). BIPIX was incepted earlier than RMQAX: BIPIX (25 years) vs RMQAX (11 years). RMQAX (1.82) is less costly to investors than BIPIX (1.56). RMQAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 1036.00 vs. BIPIX (52.00). RMQAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BIPIX: RMQAX (2500) vs BIPIX (15000). RMQAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.52 vs. BIPIX (1.68). RMQAX return over 5 years is better than : 109.91 vs. BIPIX (-9.00).
| BIPIX | RMQAX | BIPIX / RMQAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 1.26 | 124% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 1.82 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 35.298 | 29.787 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 15000 | 2500 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 94M | 467M | 20% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.14 | 0.19 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.68 | 8.52 | 20% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.50 | 171.81 | 1% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.00 | 109.91 | -8% |
| Returns for 10 years | -4.28 | 1020.16 | -0% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement