Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIPIX vs RMQAX
BIPIX vs RMQAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIPIX vs. RMQAX commentary
Sep 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIPIX is a Hold and RMQAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMQAX has more cash in the bank: 963M vs. BIPIX (68.6M). RMQAX pays higher dividends than BIPIX: RMQAX (0.22) vs BIPIX (0.19). BIPIX was incepted earlier than RMQAX: BIPIX (25 years) vs RMQAX (11 years). RMQAX (1.82) is less costly to investors than BIPIX (1.56). RMQAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 1036.00 vs. BIPIX (196.00). RMQAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BIPIX: RMQAX (2500) vs BIPIX (15000). RMQAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.93 vs. BIPIX (-30.83). RMQAX return over 5 years is better than : 132.36 vs. BIPIX (-27.23).
| BIPIX | RMQAX | BIPIX / RMQAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 1.26 | 124% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 1.82 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.032 | 23.329 | 17% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 15000 | 2500 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 68.6M | 963M | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.19 | 0.22 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | -30.83 | 13.93 | -221% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.56 | 137.82 | -8% |
| Returns for 5 years | -27.23 | 132.36 | -21% |
| Returns for 10 years | -31.62 | 1117.71 | -3% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement