BITF
Price
$0.78
Change
-$0.02 (-2.50%)
Updated
Jun 20 closing price
Capitalization
742.84M
56 days until earnings call
CLSK
Price
$9.00
Change
-$0.18 (-1.96%)
Updated
Jun 20 closing price
Capitalization
4.78B
50 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BITF vs CLSK

Header iconBITF vs CLSK Comparison
Open Charts BITF vs CLSKBanner chart's image
Bitfarms
Price$0.78
Change-$0.02 (-2.50%)
Volume$13.77M
Capitalization742.84M
CleanSpark
Price$9.00
Change-$0.18 (-1.96%)
Volume$36.24M
Capitalization4.78B
BITF vs CLSK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BITF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BITF vs. CLSK commentary
Jun 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BITF is a Hold and CLSK is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 23, 2025
Stock price -- (BITF: $0.78 vs. CLSK: $9.00)
Brand notoriety: BITF and CLSK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BITF: 97% vs. CLSK: 138%
Market capitalization -- BITF: $742.84M vs. CLSK: $4.78B
BITF [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $742.84M. CLSK’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $4.78B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BITF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCLSK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BITF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CLSK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CLSK is a better buy in the long-term than BITF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BITF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CLSK’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BITF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • CLSK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLSK is a better buy in the short-term than BITF.

Price Growth

BITF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -7.41% price change this week, while CLSK (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -3.23% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -0.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +97.00%.

Reported Earning Dates

BITF is expected to report earnings on Aug 18, 2025.

CLSK is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-0.23% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLSK($4.78B) has a higher market cap than BITF($743M). CLSK YTD gains are higher at: -2.280 vs. BITF (-47.893). CLSK has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 60.4M vs. BITF (-7.73M). CLSK has more cash in the bank: 176M vs. BITF (116M). CLSK has less debt than BITF: CLSK (15.2M) vs BITF (19.9M). CLSK has higher revenues than BITF: CLSK (216M) vs BITF (146M).
BITFCLSKBITF / CLSK
Capitalization743M4.78B16%
EBITDA-7.73M60.4M-13%
Gain YTD-47.893-2.2802,100%
P/E Ratio10.38N/A-
Revenue146M216M68%
Total Cash116M176M66%
Total Debt19.9M15.2M131%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BITF vs CLSK: Fundamental Ratings
BITF
CLSK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9381
SMR RATING
1..100
9393
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9463
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10081
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BITF's Valuation (69) in the null industry is in the same range as CLSK (82). This means that BITF’s stock grew similarly to CLSK’s over the last 12 months.

CLSK's Profit vs Risk Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as BITF (93). This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to BITF’s over the last 12 months.

CLSK's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as BITF (93). This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to BITF’s over the last 12 months.

CLSK's Price Growth Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as BITF (94). This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to BITF’s over the last 12 months.

CLSK's P/E Growth Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as BITF (100). This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to BITF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BITFCLSK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
87%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BITF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PZT21.620.12
+0.56%
Invesco New York AMT-Free Muni Bd ETF
BSCW20.460.02
+0.10%
Invesco BulletShares 2032 Corp Bd ETF
DDEC40.78-0.06
-0.14%
FT Vest US Equity Dp Bfr ETF Dec
MMSC19.75-0.09
-0.45%
First Trust Multi-Manager Sm Cp Opps ETF
DFAE28.00-0.20
-0.71%
Dimensional Emerging Core Equity Mkt ETF

BITF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BITF has been closely correlated with HIVE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BITF jumps, then HIVE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BITF
1D Price
Change %
BITF100%
-2.34%
HIVE - BITF
87%
Closely correlated
-3.41%
CLSK - BITF
84%
Closely correlated
-1.96%
RIOT - BITF
81%
Closely correlated
-3.87%
MARA - BITF
77%
Closely correlated
-1.17%
BTBT - BITF
77%
Closely correlated
-3.32%
More