Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIVIX vs NLSCX
BIVIX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts BIVIX vs NLSCX
Invenomic Institutional
Price$16.65
Change-$0.23 (-1.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets989.53M
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.72
Change+$0.03 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.84B
BIVIX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIVIX vs. NLSCX commentary
Oct 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIVIX is a Buy and NLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.84B vs. BIVIX (990M). BIVIX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: BIVIX (3.97) vs NLSCX (0.00). BIVIX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: BIVIX (8 years) vs NLSCX (14 years). BIVIX (3.17) is less costly to investors than NLSCX (2.43). BIVIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 170.00 vs. NLSCX (48.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BIVIX: NLSCX (1000) vs BIVIX (50000). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.29 vs. BIVIX (1.31). BIVIX return over 5 years is better than : 70.87 vs. NLSCX (17.11).
| BIVIX | NLSCX | BIVIX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 3.17 | 2.43 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.17 | 2.43 | 130% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.813 | 5.653 | -67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 50000 | 1000 | 5,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 990M | 7.84B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.97 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.31 | 7.29 | 18% |
| Returns for 3 years | -24.17 | 20.58 | -117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 70.87 | 17.11 | 414% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 43.44 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement