Ad is loading...
BIVRX vs CPCLX
BIVRX vs CPCLX Comparison
Open Charts BIVRX vs CPCLX
Calamos Phineus Long/Short C
Price$15.34
Change-$0.10 (-0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.03B
BIVRX vs CPCLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIVRX vs. CPCLX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIVRX is a Hold and CPCLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BIVRX has more cash in the bank: 1.1B vs. CPCLX (1.03B). BIVRX pays higher dividends than CPCLX: BIVRX (2.36) vs CPCLX (0.90). BIVRX was incepted earlier than CPCLX: BIVRX (8 years) vs CPCLX (9 years). CPCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 194.00 vs. BIVRX (140.00). CPCLX has a lower initial minimum investment than BIVRX: CPCLX (2500) vs BIVRX (5000). CPCLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.91 vs. BIVRX (-8.12). BIVRX return over 5 years is better than : 56.05 vs. CPCLX (39.61).
| BIVRX | CPCLX | BIVRX / CPCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.241 | 1.522 | -147% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 2500 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.1B | 1.03B | 107% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.36 | 0.90 | 261% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.12 | 4.91 | -165% |
| Returns for 3 years | -13.78 | 3.98 | -346% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.05 | 39.61 | 141% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |