Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIVSX vs CPCLX
BIVSX vs CPCLX Comparison
Open Charts BIVSX vs CPCLX
Invenomic Super Institutional
Price$18.11
Change+$0.12 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.04B
Calamos Phineus Long/Short C
Price$16.84
Change+$0.14 (+0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.14B
BIVSX vs CPCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIVSX vs. CPCLX commentary
Sep 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIVSX is a Hold and CPCLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CPCLX has more cash in the bank: 1.14B vs. BIVSX (1.04B). BIVSX pays higher dividends than CPCLX: BIVSX (3.97) vs CPCLX (2.80). BIVSX was incepted earlier than CPCLX: BIVSX (6 years) vs CPCLX (9 years). CPCLX (3.19) is less costly to investors than BIVSX (2.92). CPCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 342.00 vs. BIVSX (170.00). CPCLX has a lower initial minimum investment than BIVSX: CPCLX (2500) vs BIVSX (50000000). CPCLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.36 vs. BIVSX (5.29). BIVSX return over 5 years is better than : 69.57 vs. CPCLX (55.72).
| BIVSX | CPCLX | BIVSX / CPCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.92 | 3.19 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.92 | 3.19 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.191 | 11.449 | 28% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 50000000 | 2500 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.04B | 1.14B | 92% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.97 | 2.80 | 142% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.29 | 9.36 | 56% |
| Returns for 3 years | -18.33 | 25.15 | -73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 69.57 | 55.72 | 125% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement