Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIVSX vs CPCLX
BIVSX vs CPCLX Comparison
Open Charts BIVSX vs CPCLX
Invenomic Super Institutional
Price$17.08
Change-$0.14 (-0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets937.2M
Calamos Phineus Long/Short C
Price$16.81
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.12B
BIVSX vs CPCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIVSX vs. CPCLX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIVSX is a Hold and CPCLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CPCLX has more cash in the bank: 1.12B vs. BIVSX (937M). BIVSX pays higher dividends than CPCLX: BIVSX (4.32) vs CPCLX (2.85). BIVSX was incepted earlier than CPCLX: BIVSX (6 years) vs CPCLX (9 years). CPCLX (3.19) is less costly to investors than BIVSX (2.92). CPCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 342.00 vs. BIVSX (170.00). CPCLX has a lower initial minimum investment than BIVSX: CPCLX (2500) vs BIVSX (50000000). CPCLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.38 vs. BIVSX (2.22). BIVSX return over 5 years is better than : 73.68 vs. CPCLX (54.75).
| BIVSX | CPCLX | BIVSX / CPCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.92 | 3.19 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.92 | 3.19 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.880 | 11.251 | -17% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 50000000 | 2500 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 937M | 1.12B | 84% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.32 | 2.85 | 151% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.22 | 9.38 | 24% |
| Returns for 3 years | -21.45 | 28.60 | -75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 73.68 | 54.75 | 135% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement