Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BIVSX vs NLSAX
BIVSX vs NLSAX Comparison
Open Charts BIVSX vs NLSAX
Invenomic Super Institutional
Price$17.30
Change+$0.13 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets991.07M
Neuberger Berman Long Short A
Price$19.64
Change-$0.09 (-0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.05B
BIVSX vs NLSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BIVSX vs. NLSAX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BIVSX is a Hold and NLSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSAX has more cash in the bank: 8.05B vs. BIVSX (991M). BIVSX pays higher dividends than NLSAX: BIVSX (4.53) vs NLSAX (0.00). BIVSX was incepted earlier than NLSAX: BIVSX (7 years) vs NLSAX (14 years). BIVSX (2.92) is less costly to investors than NLSAX (1.68). BIVSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 170.00 vs. NLSAX (48.00). NLSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BIVSX: NLSAX (1000) vs BIVSX (50000000). NLSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.11 vs. BIVSX (0.32). BIVSX return over 5 years is better than : 49.54 vs. NLSAX (20.51).
| BIVSX | NLSAX | BIVSX / NLSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.92 | 1.68 | 174% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.92 | 1.68 | 174% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.165 | 6.880 | -31% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 50000000 | 1000 | 5,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 991M | 8.05B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.53 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.32 | 8.11 | 4% |
| Returns for 3 years | -27.60 | 20.88 | -132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.54 | 20.51 | 242% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 56.23 | - |