Advertisement
BJTRF vs CNADF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BJTRF is a Hold and CNADF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BJTRF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCNADF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- BJTRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- CNADF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Price Growth
BJTRF (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CNADF (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Generic industry was +1.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +68.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +81.63%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Pharmaceuticals: Generic (+1.25% weekly)A generic drug contains the same chemical substance as a drug that was originally protected by patents. Generic drugs are generally sold at cheaper price points, compared to name-brand pharmaceuticals, after patents for the more expensive drugs lapse. The generic drug industry has created a major market, thanks to the lower pricing. According to the Center for Justice and Democracy at New York Law School, 80 percent of all drugs prescribed are generic, and generic drugs are chosen 94 percent of the time when they are available. But their manufacturers must be able to prove to the FDA that they can be effective substitutes for the original drugs. Some of the major generic drug makers include Zoetis, Inc., Allergan plc and Mylan N.V.
| BJTRF | CNADF | BJTRF / CNADF | |
| Capitalization | 987M | 4.5M | 21,948% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 1.54M | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | 78.571 | - |
| P/E Ratio | 7.79 | 11.57 | 67% |
| Revenue | N/A | 17.2M | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | 948K | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 9.18M | - |
| BJTRF | CNADF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 2% | 2 days ago 30% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 2% | 2 days ago 35% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Advertisement
BJTRF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BJTRF has been loosely correlated with CNADF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BJTRF jumps, then CNADF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BJTRF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJTRF | 100% | N/A | ||
| CNADF - BJTRF | 61% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| FLGC - BJTRF | 2% Poorly correlated | -6.22% | ||
| OPTHF - BJTRF | 2% Poorly correlated | +5.11% | ||
| LVZPF - BJTRF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SWGHF - BJTRF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
CNADF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNADF has been loosely correlated with BJTRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CNADF jumps, then BJTRF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CNADF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNADF | 100% | N/A | ||
| BJTRF - CNADF | 61% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| STEK - CNADF | 26% Poorly correlated | -4.07% | ||
| PLSH - CNADF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| HLN - CNADF | 15% Poorly correlated | -0.21% | ||
| PLNH - CNADF | 5% Poorly correlated | -2.41% | ||
More | ||||