Ad is loading...
BJTRF
Price
$0.65
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Apr 1 closing price
SWGHF
Price
$13.40
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Ad is loading...

BJTRF vs SWGHF

Header iconBJTRF vs SWGHF Comparison
Open Charts BJTRF vs SWGHFBanner chart's image
Beijing Tong Ren Tang Chinese Medicine Co Ltd, Hong Kong
Price$0.65
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$400
CapitalizationN/A
SAWAI GROUP
Price$13.40
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$600
CapitalizationN/A
BJTRF vs SWGHF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BJTRF vs. SWGHF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BJTRF is a Hold and SWGHF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (BJTRF: $0.65 vs. SWGHF: $13.40)
Brand notoriety: BJTRF and SWGHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pharmaceuticals: Other industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BJTRF: 100% vs. SWGHF: 100%
Market capitalization -- BJTRF: $1.49B vs. SWGHF: $1.1B
BJTRF [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] is valued at $1.49B. SWGHF’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] market capitalization is $1.1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry ranges from $77.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry is $3.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BJTRF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSWGHF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BJTRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SWGHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SWGHF is a better buy in the long-term than BJTRF.

Price Growth

BJTRF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SWGHF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was -5.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.90%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Other (-5.07% weekly)

Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BJTRF($1.49B) has a higher market cap than SWGHF($1.1B). BJTRF has higher P/E ratio than SWGHF: BJTRF (17.79) vs SWGHF (13.18). SWGHF YTD gains are higher at: 48.889 vs. BJTRF (-47.710). BJTRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 724M vs. SWGHF (-28.13B). SWGHF has more cash in the bank: 29.1B vs. BJTRF (2.34B). BJTRF has less debt than SWGHF: BJTRF (109M) vs SWGHF (74B). SWGHF has higher revenues than BJTRF: SWGHF (196B) vs BJTRF (1.48B).
BJTRFSWGHFBJTRF / SWGHF
Capitalization1.49B1.1B135%
EBITDA724M-28.13B-3%
Gain YTD-47.71048.889-98%
P/E Ratio17.7913.18135%
Revenue1.48B196B1%
Total Cash2.34B29.1B8%
Total Debt109M74B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SWGHF: Fundamental Ratings
SWGHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
76
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
48
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
65
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RYFIX100.640.34
+0.34%
Rydex Financial Services Inv
PUFCX21.50-0.01
-0.05%
PGIM Jennison Financial Services C
AFVZX23.01-0.27
-1.16%
Applied Finance Select Institutional
BRGAX37.48-0.50
-1.32%
iShares Russell 1000 Large-Cap Idx Inv A
JGMNX29.99-0.53
-1.74%
Janus Henderson Triton N

BJTRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BJTRF has been loosely correlated with CNADF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BJTRF jumps, then CNADF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BJTRF
1D Price
Change %
BJTRF100%
N/A
CNADF - BJTRF
61%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FLGC - BJTRF
2%
Poorly correlated
-10.69%
OPTHF - BJTRF
2%
Poorly correlated
-19.72%
LVZPF - BJTRF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SWGHF - BJTRF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SWGHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SWGHF and GLASF have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SWGHF and GLASF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SWGHF
1D Price
Change %
SWGHF100%
N/A
GLASF - SWGHF
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.38%
BFRI - SWGHF
5%
Poorly correlated
+4.11%
TKNO - SWGHF
5%
Poorly correlated
-9.91%
FLGC - SWGHF
4%
Poorly correlated
-10.69%
AAWH - SWGHF
2%
Poorly correlated
-6.81%
More