BKAHF
Price
$0.79
Change
+$0.13 (+19.70%)
Updated
Sep 13 closing price
Capitalization
6.87B
IBN
Price
$28.16
Change
-$0.44 (-1.54%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
92.59B
57 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BKAHF vs IBN

Header iconBKAHF vs IBN Comparison
Open Charts BKAHF vs IBNBanner chart's image
Bank of Ayudhya Public
Price$0.79
Change+$0.13 (+19.70%)
Volume$200
Capitalization6.87B
ICICI Bank
Price$28.16
Change-$0.44 (-1.54%)
Volume$3.17M
Capitalization92.59B
BKAHF vs IBN Comparison Chart
Loading...
IBN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BKAHF vs. IBN commentary
Feb 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BKAHF is a Hold and IBN is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 24, 2025
Stock price -- (BKAHF: $0.79 vs. IBN: $28.16)
Brand notoriety: BKAHF and IBN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BKAHF: 100% vs. IBN: 88%
Market capitalization -- BKAHF: $6.87B vs. IBN: $92.59B
BKAHF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $6.87B. IBN’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $92.59B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BKAHF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileIBN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BKAHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • IBN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BKAHF is a better buy in the long-term than IBN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IBN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • IBN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

BKAHF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while IBN (@Regional Banks) price change was -3.43% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

IBN is expected to report earnings on Apr 21, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-1.09% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IBN($92.6B) has a higher market cap than BKAHF($6.87B). IBN has higher P/E ratio than BKAHF: IBN (18.20) vs BKAHF (7.64). BKAHF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. IBN (-5.693). BKAHF has less debt than IBN: BKAHF (375B) vs IBN (2.01T). IBN has higher revenues than BKAHF: IBN (1.55T) vs BKAHF (115B).
BKAHFIBNBKAHF / IBN
Capitalization6.87B92.6B7%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.000-5.693-
P/E Ratio7.6418.2042%
Revenue115B1.55T7%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt375B2.01T19%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BKAHF vs IBN: Fundamental Ratings
BKAHF
IBN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5021
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10018
SMR RATING
1..100
11
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5056
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4753
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
38n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BKAHF's Valuation (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for IBN (96) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that BKAHF’s stock grew significantly faster than IBN’s over the last 12 months.

IBN's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for BKAHF (100) in the null industry. This means that IBN’s stock grew significantly faster than BKAHF’s over the last 12 months.

IBN's SMR Rating (1) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BKAHF (1) in the null industry. This means that IBN’s stock grew similarly to BKAHF’s over the last 12 months.

BKAHF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as IBN (56) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that BKAHF’s stock grew similarly to IBN’s over the last 12 months.

BKAHF's P/E Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as IBN (53) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that BKAHF’s stock grew similarly to IBN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IBN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
IBN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VICI31.280.52
+1.69%
VICI Properties
DLO12.60-0.29
-2.25%
DLocal Limited
PENG21.35-0.77
-3.48%
Penguin Solutions Inc
AMPY5.05-0.19
-3.63%
Amplify Energy Corp
USEG1.95-0.10
-4.88%
US Energy Corp

BKAHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BKAHF has been loosely correlated with MLYNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BKAHF jumps, then MLYNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BKAHF
1D Price
Change %
BKAHF100%
N/A
MLYNF - BKAHF
42%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BKQNY - BKAHF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MSWV - BKAHF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RBNK - BKAHF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IBN - BKAHF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.54%
More

IBN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IBN has been loosely correlated with SBNY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IBN jumps, then SBNY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IBN
1D Price
Change %
IBN100%
-1.54%
SBNY - IBN
59%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HDB - IBN
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
NU - IBN
30%
Poorly correlated
-18.89%
ISNPY - IBN
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.29%
BSBR - IBN
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.91%
More