BKBLF
Price
$0.05
Change
+$0.01 (+25.00%)
Updated
Feb 26 closing price
Capitalization
3.2M
BOMXF
Price
$2.02
Change
-$0.01 (-0.49%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
1.14B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BKBLF vs BOMXF

Header iconBKBLF vs BOMXF Comparison
Open Charts BKBLF vs BOMXFBanner chart's image
Magnetic North Acquisition
Price$0.05
Change+$0.01 (+25.00%)
Volume$700
Capitalization3.2M
Bolsa Mexicana de Valores, S.A.B. de C.V
Price$2.02
Change-$0.01 (-0.49%)
Volume$4K
Capitalization1.14B
BKBLF vs BOMXF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BKBLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BOMXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BKBLF vs. BOMXF commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BKBLF is a Hold and BOMXF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (BKBLF: $0.05 vs. BOMXF: $2.02)
Brand notoriety: BKBLF and BOMXF are both not notable
BKBLF represents the Investment Banks/Brokers, while BOMXF is part of the Financial Publishing/Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BKBLF: 100% vs. BOMXF: 62%
Market capitalization -- BKBLF: $3.2M vs. BOMXF: $1.14B
BKBLF [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $3.2M. BOMXF’s [@Financial Publishing/Services] market capitalization is $1.14B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry ranges from $167.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.29B. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry is $31.3B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BKBLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileBOMXF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BKBLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • BOMXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BKBLF is a better buy in the long-term than BOMXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BKBLF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BOMXF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BKBLF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • BOMXF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BKBLF is a better buy in the short-term than BOMXF.

Price Growth

BKBLF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while BOMXF (@Financial Publishing/Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +3.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.66%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was +1.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.69%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+3.94% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

@Financial Publishing/Services (+1.32% weekly)

The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BOMXF($1.14B) has a higher market cap than BKBLF($3.2M). BOMXF YTD gains are higher at: 25.466 vs. BKBLF (22.169). BOMXF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.99B vs. BKBLF (-1.48M). BOMXF has more cash in the bank: 3.42B vs. BKBLF (32.4K). BKBLF has less debt than BOMXF: BKBLF (427K) vs BOMXF (423M). BOMXF has higher revenues than BKBLF: BOMXF (4.18B) vs BKBLF (240K).
BKBLFBOMXFBKBLF / BOMXF
Capitalization3.2M1.14B0%
EBITDA-1.48M2.99B-0%
Gain YTD22.16925.46687%
P/E RatioN/A12.36-
Revenue240K4.18B0%
Total Cash32.4K3.42B0%
Total Debt427K423M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BKBLF vs BOMXF: Fundamental Ratings
BKBLF
BOMXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3277
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7455
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BKBLF's Valuation (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BOMXF (88). This means that BKBLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BOMXF’s over the last 12 months.

BKBLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as BOMXF (100). This means that BKBLF’s stock grew similarly to BOMXF’s over the last 12 months.

BKBLF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as BOMXF (100). This means that BKBLF’s stock grew similarly to BOMXF’s over the last 12 months.

BOMXF's Price Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as BKBLF (74). This means that BOMXF’s stock grew similarly to BKBLF’s over the last 12 months.

BOMXF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as BKBLF (100). This means that BOMXF’s stock grew similarly to BKBLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BKBLFBOMXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
14%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
10%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
50%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BKBLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BOMXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BGFIX13.56N/A
N/A
William Blair Growth I
NBGIX65.61N/A
N/A
Neuberger Berman Genesis Instl
LEQCX12.01N/A
N/A
LoCorr Dynamic Opportunity C
WPSIX56.83N/A
N/A
AB Concentrated Growth I
DWGFX12.80-0.02
-0.16%
American Funds Dvlpg Wld Gr&Inc F1

BKBLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BKBLF and IVTJF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BKBLF and IVTJF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BKBLF
1D Price
Change %
BKBLF100%
N/A
IVTJF - BKBLF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BBKCF - BKBLF
20%
Poorly correlated
+10.11%
BOMXF - BKBLF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CCORF - BKBLF
1%
Poorly correlated
-1.01%
CIIHY - BKBLF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

BOMXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BOMXF and JEF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BOMXF and JEF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BOMXF
1D Price
Change %
BOMXF100%
N/A
JEF - BOMXF
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.13%
XP - BOMXF
25%
Poorly correlated
+8.68%
RJF - BOMXF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.45%
EVR - BOMXF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.34%
SCHW - BOMXF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.23%
More