BKBLF
Price
$0.05
Change
+$0.01 (+25.00%)
Updated
Feb 26 closing price
Capitalization
3.2M
CIIHY
Price
$37.01
Change
-$2.99 (-7.47%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Capitalization
63.59B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BKBLF vs CIIHY

Header iconBKBLF vs CIIHY Comparison
Open Charts BKBLF vs CIIHYBanner chart's image
Magnetic North Acquisition
Price$0.05
Change+$0.01 (+25.00%)
Volume$700
Capitalization3.2M
Citic Securities
Price$37.01
Change-$2.99 (-7.47%)
Volume$503
Capitalization63.59B
BKBLF vs CIIHY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BKBLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CIIHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BKBLF vs. CIIHY commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BKBLF is a Hold and CIIHY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (BKBLF: $0.05 vs. CIIHY: $37.01)
Brand notoriety: BKBLF and CIIHY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BKBLF: 100% vs. CIIHY: 16%
Market capitalization -- BKBLF: $3.2M vs. CIIHY: $63.59B
BKBLF [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $3.2M. CIIHY’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $63.59B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BKBLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCIIHY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BKBLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CIIHY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CIIHY is a better buy in the long-term than BKBLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BKBLF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CIIHY’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BKBLF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • CIIHY’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BKBLF is a better buy in the short-term than CIIHY.

Price Growth

BKBLF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CIIHY (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -7.48% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +3.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.66%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+3.94% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIIHY($63.6B) has a higher market cap than BKBLF($3.2M). CIIHY YTD gains are higher at: 37.334 vs. BKBLF (22.169). CIIHY has higher revenues than BKBLF: CIIHY (67.7B) vs BKBLF (240K).
BKBLFCIIHYBKBLF / CIIHY
Capitalization3.2M63.6B0%
EBITDA-1.48MN/A-
Gain YTD22.16937.33459%
P/E RatioN/A17.53-
Revenue240K67.7B0%
Total Cash32.4KN/A-
Total Debt427KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BKBLF vs CIIHY: Fundamental Ratings
BKBLF
CIIHY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3298
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10045
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7437
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CIIHY's Valuation (25) in the null industry is in the same range as BKBLF (34). This means that CIIHY’s stock grew similarly to BKBLF’s over the last 12 months.

CIIHY's Profit vs Risk Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BKBLF (100). This means that CIIHY’s stock grew somewhat faster than BKBLF’s over the last 12 months.

CIIHY's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as BKBLF (100). This means that CIIHY’s stock grew similarly to BKBLF’s over the last 12 months.

CIIHY's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BKBLF (74). This means that CIIHY’s stock grew somewhat faster than BKBLF’s over the last 12 months.

CIIHY's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as BKBLF (100). This means that CIIHY’s stock grew similarly to BKBLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BKBLFCIIHY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
14%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
10%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
39%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BKBLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CIIHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BLZE8.400.20
+2.44%
Backblaze
HE12.890.28
+2.22%
Hawaiian Electric Industries
IVDA1.62-0.01
-0.61%
Iveda Solutions Inc
MGA45.95-0.34
-0.73%
Magna International
WHWK1.77-0.04
-2.21%
Whitehawk Therapeutics Inc

BKBLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BKBLF and IVTJF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BKBLF and IVTJF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BKBLF
1D Price
Change %
BKBLF100%
N/A
IVTJF - BKBLF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BBKCF - BKBLF
20%
Poorly correlated
+10.11%
BOMXF - BKBLF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CCORF - BKBLF
1%
Poorly correlated
-1.01%
CIIHY - BKBLF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CIIHY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CIIHY and FUTU have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CIIHY and FUTU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CIIHY
1D Price
Change %
CIIHY100%
N/A
FUTU - CIIHY
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.19%
TIGR - CIIHY
22%
Poorly correlated
+10.72%
DMGGF - CIIHY
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.54%
CSOL - CIIHY
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BOMXF - CIIHY
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More