BKCH
Price
$78.41
Change
-$8.75 (-10.04%)
Updated
Jun 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
384.28M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
STCE
Price
$71.45
Change
-$7.29 (-9.26%)
Updated
Jun 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
326.98M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BKCH vs STCE

Header iconBKCH vs STCE Comparison
Open Charts BKCH vs STCEBanner chart's image
BKCH vs STCE Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Global X Blockchain ETF (BKCH) vs. Schwab Crypto Thematic ETF (STCE)

Key Takeaways

  • BKCH and STCE both provide targeted exposure to companies benefiting from blockchain technology and cryptocurrency adoption, but they track different indices with varying methodologies and concentration levels.
  • Global X Blockchain ETF (BKCH) maintains a higher expense ratio of 0.50% compared to Schwab Crypto Thematic ETF (STCE) at 0.30%, reflecting differences in cost structure that can influence long-term net returns.
  • STCE offers slightly broader diversification with approximately 40 holdings versus BKCH’s 34, though both exhibit significant concentration in top positions within the information technology and financials sectors.
  • BKCH follows the Solactive Blockchain Index with a focus on mining, transactions, applications, hardware, and integration, while STCE tracks the Schwab Crypto Thematic Index emphasizing cryptocurrency-related business activities and distributed ledger technology.
  • Both ETFs are passively managed thematic vehicles with elevated volatility profiles driven by sector rotation, regulatory developments, and macroeconomic factors affecting digital assets.
  • STCE’s lower cost and comparable thematic focus may appeal to cost-conscious investors seeking similar blockchain exposure within the broader cryptocurrency ecosystem.

Introduction

Global X Blockchain ETF (BKCH) and Schwab Crypto Thematic ETF (STCE) represent specialized vehicles for investors seeking exposure to the evolving blockchain and cryptocurrency landscape. These ETFs do not compete directly in every respect but serve as alternative strategies within the same thematic sector, allowing investors to compare structural features, cost efficiency, and index methodologies while pursuing similar goals of capitalizing on digital asset adoption without direct cryptocurrency ownership.

Global X Blockchain ETF (BKCH) Overview

Global X Blockchain ETF (BKCH) is a passively managed exchange-traded fund that seeks to track the Solactive Blockchain Index. The fund holds 34 securities and maintains significant exposure to companies involved in digital asset mining, blockchain transactions, applications, hardware, and integration. Top holdings typically include names such as IREN, CRCL, COIN, HUT, and BMNR. Sector allocation as of recent data shows approximately 58.5% in information technology and 41.2% in financials. The expense ratio stands at 0.50%. BKCH employs a rules-based approach with global reach across multiple industries tied to blockchain adoption.

Schwab Crypto Thematic ETF (STCE) Overview

Schwab Crypto Thematic ETF (STCE) is a passively managed exchange-traded fund designed to track the Schwab Crypto Thematic Index. The fund typically holds around 40 securities focused on companies that may benefit from the development or utilization of cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology, including mining, trading, banking, and applications. Representative top holdings often feature COIN, MSTR, MARA, RIOT, and CLSK. Sector breakdown emphasizes information technology and financials, similar to peer thematic products. The expense ratio is 0.30%. STCE uses a thematic relevance weighting methodology subject to minimum and maximum constraints for balanced exposure within the cryptocurrency ecosystem.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The blockchain and cryptocurrency sector continues to evolve amid regulatory developments, institutional adoption, and macroeconomic influences such as interest rate expectations and capital flows into digital assets. Catalysts include expanding use cases beyond finance, such as digital identity and content ownership, alongside ongoing innovation in scaling solutions and infrastructure. Risks encompass technology adoption rates, cybersecurity concerns, competitive intensity, and potential regulatory shifts that could affect mining operations or trading platforms. Both ETFs position investors for broader ecosystem growth rather than direct asset ownership, with performance often tied to earnings cycles of key holdings and sector-wide momentum.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, both Global X Blockchain ETF (BKCH) and Schwab Crypto Thematic ETF (STCE) have demonstrated heightened sensitivity to sector rotation and sentiment around digital assets. BKCH’s index methodology and holding concentration can lead to distinct volatility patterns relative to STCE’s thematic weighting approach. Positioning differences arise from index construction, with BKCH emphasizing a broader set of blockchain applications and STCE focusing more narrowly on crypto-adjacent businesses. Relative performance has historically reflected variations in top holdings’ earnings, commodity trends affecting miners, and broader interest rate or geopolitical developments impacting risk assets.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener for tailored insights into thematic ETFs and broader market opportunities.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modest probabilistic edge to Schwab Crypto Thematic ETF (STCE) due to its lower expense ratio, comparable thematic relevance, and slightly broader diversification profile, which may support more consistent positioning amid sector momentum and risk exposure considerations.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
BKCH vs. STCE commentary
Jun 06, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BKCH is a Hold and STCE is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BKCH has more net assets: 384M vs. STCE (327M). BKCH has a higher annual dividend yield than STCE: BKCH (22.542) vs STCE (19.229). BKCH was incepted earlier than STCE: BKCH (5 years) vs STCE (4 years). STCE (0.30) has a lower expense ratio than BKCH (0.50). STCE (60.00) and BKCH (58.03) have matching turnover.
BKCHSTCEBKCH / STCE
Gain YTD22.54219.229117%
Net Assets384M327M117%
Total Expense Ratio0.500.30167%
Turnover58.0360.0097%
Yield1.391.4695%
Fund Existence5 years4 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BKCHSTCE
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BKCH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
STCE
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ARDEX5.52N/A
N/A
AMG River Road Dividend All Cap Value N
ARTSX40.47N/A
N/A
Artisan Small Cap Investor
TEQIX16.73N/A
N/A
Franklin Mutual Quest A
BRSBX15.73N/A
N/A
MFS Blended Research Small Cap Eq B
DEMZX66.44N/A
N/A
Nomura Emerging Markets R6

BKCH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BKCH has been closely correlated with CLSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BKCH jumps, then CLSK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BKCH
1D Price
Change %
BKCH100%
-10.19%
CLSK - BKCH
87%
Closely correlated
-7.09%
RIOT - BKCH
86%
Closely correlated
-10.27%
CIFR - BKCH
85%
Closely correlated
-12.17%
HUT - BKCH
85%
Closely correlated
-12.19%
IREN - BKCH
80%
Closely correlated
-12.14%
More

STCE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STCE has been closely correlated with CLSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if STCE jumps, then CLSK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STCE
1D Price
Change %
STCE100%
-9.21%
CLSK - STCE
87%
Closely correlated
-7.09%
CIFR - STCE
84%
Closely correlated
-12.17%
RIOT - STCE
84%
Closely correlated
-10.27%
HUT - STCE
84%
Closely correlated
-12.19%
MARA - STCE
80%
Closely correlated
-11.24%
More