Ad is loading...
BKGCX vs RERFX
BKGCX vs RERFX Comparison
Open Charts BKGCX vs RERFX
Baillie Gifford EAFE Plus All Cap K
Price$15.00
Change+$0.02 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets255.6M
American Funds Europacific Growth R5
Price$57.58
Change+$0.07 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets128.01B
BKGCX vs RERFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BKGCX vs. RERFX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BKGCX is a Buy and RERFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERFX has more cash in the bank: 128B vs. BKGCX (256M). BKGCX pays higher dividends than RERFX: BKGCX (3.99) vs RERFX (1.39). BKGCX was incepted earlier than RERFX: BKGCX (8 years) vs RERFX (23 years). BKGCX (0.63) is less costly to investors than RERFX (0.52). RERFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. BKGCX (23.00). RERFX has a lower initial minimum investment than BKGCX: RERFX (250) vs BKGCX (10000000). BKGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.63 vs. RERFX (-0.39). RERFX return over 5 years is better than : 27.45 vs. BKGCX (8.70).
| BKGCX | RERFX | BKGCX / RERFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.52 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.52 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.230 | 7.305 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 250 | 4,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 256M | 128B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.99 | 1.39 | 287% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.63 | -0.39 | -919% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.74 | 21.59 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.70 | 27.45 | 32% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 18.46 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...