BKHA
Price
$11.10
Change
+$0.10 (+0.91%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
46.1M
CUBWU
Price
$10.57
Change
-$0.08 (-0.75%)
Updated
Sep 3, 10:40 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

BKHA vs CUBWU

Header iconBKHA vs CUBWU Comparison
Open Charts BKHA vs CUBWUBanner chart's image
Black Hawk Acquisition
Price$11.10
Change+$0.10 (+0.91%)
Volume$1.01K
Capitalization46.1M
Lionheart Holdings
Price$10.57
Change-$0.08 (-0.75%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
BKHA vs CUBWU Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BKHA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CUBWU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BKHA vs. CUBWU commentary
Sep 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BKHA is a Buy and CUBWU is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 05, 2025
Stock price -- (BKHA: $11.10 vs. CUBWU: $10.65)
Brand notoriety: BKHA and CUBWU are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BKHA: 11% vs. CUBWU: 37%
Market capitalization -- BKHA: $46.1M vs. CUBWU: $0
BKHA [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $46.1M. CUBWU’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $172.82M.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BKHA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCUBWU’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BKHA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CUBWU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CUBWU is a better buy in the long-term than BKHA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BKHA’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CUBWU’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BKHA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • CUBWU’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CUBWU is a better buy in the short-term than BKHA.

Price Growth

BKHA (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +0.91% price change this week, while CUBWU (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.78%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-0.02% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BKHA YTD gains are higher at: 6.936 vs. CUBWU (6.287). CUBWU has more cash in the bank: 569K vs. BKHA (72.9K).
BKHACUBWUBKHA / CUBWU
Capitalization46.1MN/A-
EBITDA-542.54KN/A-
Gain YTD6.9366.287110%
P/E Ratio30.83N/A-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash72.9K569K13%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BKHACUBWU
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
6%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
14%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
13%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
6%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
8%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
5%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
5%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BKHA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CUBWU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LND3.950.03
+0.66%
BrasilAgro - Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agricolas
DTSQU10.45N/A
N/A
DT Cloud Star Acquisition Corp.
ALB79.27-0.84
-1.05%
Albemarle Corp
AMR135.90-2.50
-1.81%
Alpha Metallurgical Resources
EQ1.75-0.12
-6.42%
Equillium

BKHA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BKHA has been loosely correlated with FORL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BKHA jumps, then FORL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BKHA
1D Price
Change %
BKHA100%
+0.91%
FORL - BKHA
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ATMC - BKHA
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ANSC - BKHA
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DYCQ - BKHA
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CUBWU - BKHA
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CUBWU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CUBWU and GPAT have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CUBWU and GPAT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CUBWU
1D Price
Change %
CUBWU100%
N/A
GPAT - CUBWU
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BKHA - CUBWU
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.91%
GPATU - CUBWU
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CCIX - CUBWU
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.28%
MACI - CUBWU
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More