BKHYY
Price
$58.50
Change
-$2.45 (-4.02%)
Updated
Nov 27 closing price
77 days until earnings call
TFC
Price
$43.63
Change
+$0.52 (+1.21%)
Updated
Dec 19, 10:31 AM (EDT)
29 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BKHYY vs TFC

Header iconBKHYY vs TFC Comparison
Open Charts BKHYY vs TFCBanner chart's image
Bank Hapoalim B.M
Price$58.50
Change-$2.45 (-4.02%)
Volume$154
CapitalizationN/A
Truist Financial
Price$43.63
Change+$0.52 (+1.21%)
Volume$11.82K
CapitalizationN/A
BKHYY vs TFC Comparison Chart
Loading...
BKHYY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BKHYY vs. TFC commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BKHYY is a Hold and TFC is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (BKHYY: $57.45 vs. TFC: $43.11)
Brand notoriety: BKHYY and TFC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BKHYY: 73% vs. TFC: 107%
Market capitalization -- BKHYY: $11.78B vs. TFC: $52.02B
BKHYY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $11.78B. TFC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $52.02B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BKHYY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileTFC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BKHYY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • TFC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BKHYY is a better buy in the long-term than TFC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BKHYY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TFC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BKHYY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TFC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TFC is a better buy in the short-term than BKHYY.

Price Growth

BKHYY (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TFC (@Regional Banks) price change was -5.58% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -2.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.55%.

Reported Earning Dates

BKHYY is expected to report earnings on Mar 06, 2025.

TFC is expected to report earnings on Jan 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-2.30% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TFC($52B) has a higher market cap than BKHYY($11.8B). TFC has higher P/E ratio than BKHYY: TFC (7.93) vs BKHYY (6.52). BKHYY YTD gains are higher at: 42.785 vs. TFC (22.948). TFC has higher revenues than BKHYY: TFC (23.4B) vs BKHYY (19.4B).
BKHYYTFCBKHYY / TFC
Capitalization11.8B52B23%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD42.78522.948186%
P/E Ratio6.527.9382%
Revenue19.4B23.4B83%
Total CashN/A5.07B-
Total DebtN/A59.7B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BKHYY vs TFC: Fundamental Ratings
BKHYY
TFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9360
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
45
Fair valued
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
22100
SMR RATING
1..100
34
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4046
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2683
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BKHYY's Valuation (45) in the null industry is in the same range as TFC (59). This means that BKHYY’s stock grew similarly to TFC’s over the last 12 months.

BKHYY's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TFC (100). This means that BKHYY’s stock grew significantly faster than TFC’s over the last 12 months.

BKHYY's SMR Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as TFC (4). This means that BKHYY’s stock grew similarly to TFC’s over the last 12 months.

BKHYY's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as TFC (46). This means that BKHYY’s stock grew similarly to TFC’s over the last 12 months.

BKHYY's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TFC (83). This means that BKHYY’s stock grew somewhat faster than TFC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BKHYYTFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BKHYY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BKBDX12.35N/A
N/A
BlackRock Global Dividend K
ABPAX12.22-0.22
-1.77%
AB Sustainable Thematic Bal Port A
FFFMX54.77-1.42
-2.53%
American Funds American Mutual 529-F-3
GSXCX25.90-0.98
-3.65%
abrdn US Small Cap Equity C
TRSGX38.81-2.88
-6.90%
T. Rowe Price Spectrum Mod Gr Allc

BKHYY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BKHYY and BLMIF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BKHYY and BLMIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BKHYY
1D Price
Change %
BKHYY100%
N/A
BLMIF - BKHYY
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GVFF - BKHYY
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMBNF - BKHYY
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ISTR - BKHYY
23%
Poorly correlated
-4.61%
TFC - BKHYY
23%
Poorly correlated
-4.48%
More

TFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TFC has been closely correlated with CFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TFC jumps, then CFG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TFC
1D Price
Change %
TFC100%
-4.48%
CFG - TFC
83%
Closely correlated
-4.65%
PNC - TFC
82%
Closely correlated
-3.20%
HBAN - TFC
82%
Closely correlated
-5.21%
FITB - TFC
81%
Closely correlated
-5.46%
ZION - TFC
81%
Closely correlated
-5.51%
More