BKIMF
Price
$10.96
Change
+$0.18 (+1.67%)
Updated
Mar 12 closing price
Capitalization
5.82B
FMFG
Price
$16.52
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 16 closing price
Capitalization
14.66M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BKIMF vs FMFG

Header iconBKIMF vs FMFG Comparison
Open Charts BKIMF vs FMFGBanner chart's image
Bankinter, S.A
Price$10.96
Change+$0.18 (+1.67%)
Volume$2.66K
Capitalization5.82B
Farmers and Merchants Bancshares
Price$16.52
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$325
Capitalization14.66M
BKIMF vs FMFG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FMFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BKIMF vs. FMFG commentary
Jul 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BKIMF is a Buy and FMFG is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 17, 2025
Stock price -- (BKIMF: $10.96 vs. FMFG: $16.52)
Brand notoriety: BKIMF and FMFG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BKIMF: 100% vs. FMFG: 59%
Market capitalization -- BKIMF: $5.82B vs. FMFG: $14.66M
BKIMF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $5.82B. FMFG’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $14.66M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BKIMF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileFMFG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BKIMF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • FMFG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BKIMF is a better buy in the long-term than FMFG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FMFG’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FMFG’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

BKIMF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FMFG (@Regional Banks) price change was +5.49% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.91%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.23% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BKIMF($5.82B) has a higher market cap than FMFG($14.7M). BKIMF YTD gains are higher at: 37.000 vs. FMFG (-17.710). FMFG has less debt than BKIMF: FMFG (2M) vs BKIMF (7.66B). BKIMF has higher revenues than FMFG: BKIMF (2.65B) vs FMFG (8.29M).
BKIMFFMFGBKIMF / FMFG
Capitalization5.82B14.7M39,612%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD37.000-17.710-209%
P/E Ratio6.51N/A-
Revenue2.65B8.29M31,946%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt7.66B2M382,950%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BKIMF vs FMFG: Fundamental Ratings
BKIMF
FMFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5094
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
567
SMR RATING
1..100
962
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4752
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2414
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FMFG's Valuation (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BKIMF (79). This means that FMFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than BKIMF’s over the last 12 months.

BKIMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FMFG (67). This means that BKIMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FMFG’s over the last 12 months.

BKIMF's SMR Rating (9) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FMFG (62). This means that BKIMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FMFG’s over the last 12 months.

BKIMF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as FMFG (52). This means that BKIMF’s stock grew similarly to FMFG’s over the last 12 months.

FMFG's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is in the same range as BKIMF (24). This means that FMFG’s stock grew similarly to BKIMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BKIMFFMFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FMFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IAUGF5.52N/A
N/A
Insurance Australia Group Ltd.
LMPX0.03N/A
N/A
LMP Automotive Holdings, Inc.
HNLGF1.37N/A
N/A
Hang Lung Group Ltd.
LWCL38.00-0.25
-0.65%
Lewis & Clark BANCORP
MLXEF0.43-0.02
-4.06%
Metals X, Ltd.

BKIMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BKIMF has been loosely correlated with GWBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BKIMF jumps, then GWBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BKIMF
1D Price
Change %
BKIMF100%
N/A
GWBK - BKIMF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
LYBC - BKIMF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MSBB - BKIMF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FMFG - BKIMF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NCXS - BKIMF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.56%
More

FMFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FMFG and COSO have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FMFG and COSO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FMFG
1D Price
Change %
FMFG100%
N/A
COSO - FMFG
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.99%
BKIMF - FMFG
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FMBL - FMFG
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FNRN - FMFG
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FNFI - FMFG
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More