BKIMF
Price
$8.00
Change
+$0.03 (+0.38%)
Updated
Dec 10 closing price
NCXS
Price
$43.80
Change
+$0.80 (+1.86%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
Ad is loading...

BKIMF vs NCXS

Header iconBKIMF vs NCXS Comparison
Open Charts BKIMF vs NCXSBanner chart's image
Bankinter, S.A
Price$8.00
Change+$0.03 (+0.38%)
Volume$1K
CapitalizationN/A
NBC Ban
Price$43.80
Change+$0.80 (+1.86%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
BKIMF vs NCXS Comparison Chart
Loading...
BKIMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NCXS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BKIMF vs. NCXS commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BKIMF is a Buy and NCXS is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (BKIMF: $8.00 vs. NCXS: $43.80)
Brand notoriety: BKIMF and NCXS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BKIMF: 183% vs. NCXS: 25%
Market capitalization -- BKIMF: $5.82B vs. NCXS: $0
BKIMF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $5.82B. NCXS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BKIMF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNCXS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BKIMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NCXS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BKIMF is a better buy in the long-term than NCXS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BKIMF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NCXS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BKIMF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • NCXS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BKIMF and NCXS are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BKIMF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NCXS (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -3.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.80%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-3.34% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BKIMF YTD gains are higher at: 30.081 vs. NCXS (-9.853).
BKIMFNCXSBKIMF / NCXS
Capitalization5.82BN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD30.081-9.853-305%
P/E Ratio6.51N/A-
Revenue2.65BN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt7.66BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BKIMF vs NCXS: Fundamental Ratings
BKIMF
NCXS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4648
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
45
Fair valued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
39100
SMR RATING
1..100
8100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4852
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4251
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NCXS's Valuation (18) in the null industry is in the same range as BKIMF (45). This means that NCXS’s stock grew similarly to BKIMF’s over the last 12 months.

BKIMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NCXS (100). This means that BKIMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NCXS’s over the last 12 months.

BKIMF's SMR Rating (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NCXS (100). This means that BKIMF’s stock grew significantly faster than NCXS’s over the last 12 months.

BKIMF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as NCXS (52). This means that BKIMF’s stock grew similarly to NCXS’s over the last 12 months.

BKIMF's P/E Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as NCXS (51). This means that BKIMF’s stock grew similarly to NCXS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BKIMFNCXS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
30%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
23%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
21%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
24%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
18%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BKIMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NCXS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TEUIX23.30-0.04
-0.17%
T. Rowe Price European Stock I
SSDSX36.38-0.34
-0.93%
DWS Small Cap Growth S
MVCJX31.52-0.33
-1.04%
MFS Mid Cap Value R4
LOGWX31.23-0.42
-1.33%
Lord Abbett Developing Growth F3
OBGIX31.25-0.63
-1.98%
Oberweis Global Opportunities Instl

BKIMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BKIMF has been loosely correlated with GWBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BKIMF jumps, then GWBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BKIMF
1D Price
Change %
BKIMF100%
N/A
GWBK - BKIMF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
LYBC - BKIMF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.61%
MSBB - BKIMF
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.46%
FMFG - BKIMF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.68%
NCXS - BKIMF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

NCXS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NCXS and GSBX have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NCXS and GSBX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NCXS
1D Price
Change %
NCXS100%
N/A
GSBX - NCXS
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MBKL - NCXS
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MSBB - NCXS
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.46%
FBPI - NCXS
22%
Poorly correlated
+7.50%
BKIMF - NCXS
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More