It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BKKT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMHUBF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BKKT’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MHUBF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
BKKT (@Packaged Software) experienced а +21.86% price change this week, while MHUBF (@Packaged Software) price change was -13.96% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +2.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.20%.
BKKT is expected to report earnings on Aug 08, 2024.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
BKKT | MHUBF | BKKT / MHUBF | |
Capitalization | 65.2M | 27.9M | 234% |
EBITDA | -114.29M | -8.19M | 1,396% |
Gain YTD | -45.112 | -3.464 | 1,302% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Revenue | 780M | 528K | 147,727% |
Total Cash | 70.3M | 897K | 7,837% |
Total Debt | 27.2M | 776K | 3,505% |
BKKT | MHUBF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago38% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 2 days ago76% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago88% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago75% | 2 days ago83% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago85% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 2 days ago84% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago83% | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago87% | 2 days ago87% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago57% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago90% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
ECNS | 25.67 | 0.32 | +1.26% |
iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF | |||
CPII | 19.49 | N/A | N/A |
Ionic Inflation Protection ETF | |||
FTSD | 90.09 | -0.16 | -0.18% |
Franklin Short Duration US Govt ETF | |||
QDPL | 39.91 | -0.10 | -0.25% |
Pacer Metaurus US Lg Cp Dvd Mltp 400 ETF | |||
JIRE | 61.84 | -0.29 | -0.47% |
JPMorgan International Rsrch Enh Eq ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BKKT has been loosely correlated with RIOT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BKKT jumps, then RIOT could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BKKT | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
BKKT | 100% | -5.67% | ||
RIOT - BKKT | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.43% | ||
COIN - BKKT | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.16% | ||
MSPR - BKKT | 55% Loosely correlated | +16.17% | ||
CLSK - BKKT | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.96% | ||
MSTR - BKKT | 38% Loosely correlated | -5.41% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that MHUBF and PHUN have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MHUBF and PHUN's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MHUBF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
MHUBF | 100% | -0.43% | ||
PHUN - MHUBF | 23% Poorly correlated | +1.15% | ||
INTZ - MHUBF | 21% Poorly correlated | +1.00% | ||
OMCL - MHUBF | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.24% | ||
RCM - MHUBF | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
BKKT - MHUBF | 13% Poorly correlated | -5.67% | ||
More |