BKKT
Price
$12.31
Change
-$0.68 (-5.23%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
65.2M
MHUBF
Price
$0.34
Change
+$0.02 (+6.25%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
27.91M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BKKT vs MHUBF

Header iconBKKT vs MHUBF Comparison
Open Charts BKKT vs MHUBFBanner chart's image
Bakkt Holdings
Price$12.31
Change-$0.68 (-5.23%)
Volume$189.73K
Capitalization65.2M
MINEHUB TECHNOLOGIES
Price$0.34
Change+$0.02 (+6.25%)
Volume$1.24K
Capitalization27.91M
BKKT vs MHUBF Comparison Chart
Loading...
BKKT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BKKT vs. MHUBF commentary
Jun 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BKKT is a Hold and MHUBF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 15, 2025
Stock price -- (BKKT: $12.31 vs. MHUBF: $0.34)
Brand notoriety: BKKT and MHUBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BKKT: 51% vs. MHUBF: 2%
Market capitalization -- BKKT: $65.2M vs. MHUBF: $27.91M
BKKT [@Packaged Software] is valued at $65.2M. MHUBF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $27.91M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BKKT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMHUBF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BKKT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MHUBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BKKT and MHUBF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BKKT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BKKT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

BKKT (@Packaged Software) experienced а -11.50% price change this week, while MHUBF (@Packaged Software) price change was -6.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +43.51%.

Reported Earning Dates

BKKT is expected to report earnings on Mar 20, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-1.68% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BKKT($65.2M) has a higher market cap than MHUBF($27.9M). MHUBF YTD gains are higher at: 57.103 vs. BKKT (-50.303). MHUBF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -8.19M vs. BKKT (-114.29M). BKKT has more cash in the bank: 70.3M vs. MHUBF (897K). MHUBF has less debt than BKKT: MHUBF (776K) vs BKKT (27.2M). BKKT has higher revenues than MHUBF: BKKT (780M) vs MHUBF (528K).
BKKTMHUBFBKKT / MHUBF
Capitalization65.2M27.9M234%
EBITDA-114.29M-8.19M1,396%
Gain YTD-50.30357.103-88%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue780M528K147,727%
Total Cash70.3M897K7,837%
Total Debt27.2M776K3,505%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BKKT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BKKT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IDN5.430.18
+3.43%
Intellicheck
IAUX0.67N/A
+0.66%
i-80 Gold Corp
ENSG151.24N/A
N/A
Ensign Group (The)
LRCX89.52-2.14
-2.33%
Lam Research Corp
RNST34.88-0.94
-2.62%
Renasant Corp

BKKT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BKKT has been loosely correlated with MSPR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BKKT jumps, then MSPR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BKKT
1D Price
Change %
BKKT100%
-5.23%
MSPR - BKKT
61%
Loosely correlated
-4.03%
RIOT - BKKT
60%
Loosely correlated
-4.80%
COIN - BKKT
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.69%
CLSK - BKKT
51%
Loosely correlated
-4.22%
MSTR - BKKT
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.82%
More

MHUBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MHUBF and PHUN have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MHUBF and PHUN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MHUBF
1D Price
Change %
MHUBF100%
+5.82%
PHUN - MHUBF
23%
Poorly correlated
-6.10%
INTZ - MHUBF
21%
Poorly correlated
-9.26%
OMCL - MHUBF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.30%
BKKT - MHUBF
13%
Poorly correlated
-5.23%
KCRD - MHUBF
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.81%
More