Ad is loading...
BKLC vs EFIV
BKLC vs EFIV Comparison
Open Charts BKLC vs EFIV
BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF
Price$100.12
Change-$3.58 (-3.45%)
Volume$110.27K
Net Assets2.53B
SPDR® S&P 500® ESG ETF
Price$49.97
Change-$1.77 (-3.42%)
Volume$92.39K
Net Assets1.53B
BKLC vs EFIV Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BKLC vs. EFIV commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BKLC is a Hold and EFIV is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BKLC has more net assets: 2.53B vs. EFIV (1.53B). BKLC has a higher annual dividend yield than EFIV: BKLC (-10.374) vs EFIV (-11.257). BKLC was incepted earlier than EFIV: BKLC (5 years) vs EFIV (5 years). BKLC (0.00) has a lower expense ratio than EFIV (0.10).
| BKLC | EFIV | BKLC / EFIV | |
| Gain YTD | -10.374 | -11.257 | 92% |
| Net Assets | 2.53B | 1.53B | 165% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.10 | - |
| Turnover | N/A | 12.00 | - |
| Yield | 1.28 | 1.30 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BKLC | EFIV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 86% | 10 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BKLC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BKLC has been closely correlated with AAPL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BKLC jumps, then AAPL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BKLC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BKLC | 100% | -3.45% | ||
| AAPL - BKLC | 69% Closely correlated | -4.24% | ||
| BLK - BKLC | 68% Closely correlated | -4.27% | ||
| APH - BKLC | 67% Closely correlated | -3.10% | ||
| MCO - BKLC | 66% Closely correlated | -3.55% | ||
| TEL - BKLC | 65% Loosely correlated | -4.86% | ||
More | ||||
EFIV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFIV has been closely correlated with WDC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EFIV jumps, then WDC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EFIV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EFIV | 100% | -3.42% | ||
| WDC - EFIV | 71% Closely correlated | -3.94% | ||
| MSFT - EFIV | 68% Closely correlated | -2.34% | ||
| CPAY - EFIV | 67% Closely correlated | -6.88% | ||
| LRCX - EFIV | 67% Closely correlated | -6.58% | ||
| HUBB - EFIV | 66% Loosely correlated | -2.87% | ||
More | ||||