Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BKMBX vs DMSFX
BKMBX vs DMSFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BKMBX vs. DMSFX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BKMBX is a Hold and DMSFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BKMBX has more cash in the bank: 7.84B vs. DMSFX (556M). DMSFX pays higher dividends than BKMBX: DMSFX (5.92) vs BKMBX (4.10). BKMBX was incepted earlier than DMSFX: BKMBX (5 years) vs DMSFX (8 years). DMSFX (1.73) is less costly to investors than BKMBX (0.82). BKMBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 242.00 vs. DMSFX (58.00). DMSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than BKMBX: DMSFX (0) vs BKMBX (5000000). DMSFX (4.62) and BKMBX (4.49) have marching annual gain over last year.
| BKMBX | DMSFX | BKMBX / DMSFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.32 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.73 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.775 | 1.902 | 146% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.84B | 556M | 1,411% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.10 | 5.92 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.49 | 4.62 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.50 | 22.79 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 29.91 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement