Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BKMBX vs FASRX
BKMBX vs FASRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BKMBX vs. FASRX commentary
Nov 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BKMBX is a Hold and FASRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BKMBX has more cash in the bank: 8.03B vs. FASRX (530M). FASRX pays higher dividends than BKMBX: FASRX (5.89) vs BKMBX (4.06). BKMBX was incepted earlier than FASRX: BKMBX (5 years) vs FASRX (12 years). FASRX (2.40) is less costly to investors than BKMBX (0.82). FASRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 266.59 vs. BKMBX (242.00). FASRX has a lower initial minimum investment than BKMBX: FASRX (1000000) vs BKMBX (5000000). FASRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.62 vs. BKMBX (3.30). BKMBX return over 5 years is better than : 21.35 vs. FASRX (7.77).
| BKMBX | FASRX | BKMBX / FASRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 2.18 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 2.40 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.964 | 7.377 | 54% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 1000000 | 500% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.03B | 530M | 1,516% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.06 | 5.89 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.30 | 3.62 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.63 | 16.98 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.35 | 7.77 | 275% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 23.71 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement