Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BKMBX vs FSKKX
BKMBX vs FSKKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BKMBX vs. FSKKX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BKMBX is a Hold and FSKKX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BKMBX has more cash in the bank: 8B vs. FSKKX (534M). FSKKX pays higher dividends than BKMBX: FSKKX (5.46) vs BKMBX (4.05). BKMBX was incepted earlier than FSKKX: BKMBX (5 years) vs FSKKX (12 years). FSKKX (3.00) is less costly to investors than BKMBX (0.82). FSKKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 266.59 vs. BKMBX (242.00). FSKKX has a lower initial minimum investment than BKMBX: FSKKX (1000) vs BKMBX (5000000). FSKKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.85 vs. BKMBX (1.83). BKMBX return over 5 years is better than : 19.14 vs. FSKKX (6.68).
| BKMBX | FSKKX | BKMBX / FSKKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 2.69 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 3.00 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.973 | 6.966 | 43% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 1000 | 500,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8B | 534M | 1,498% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.05 | 5.46 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.83 | 3.85 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.79 | 15.03 | 138% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.14 | 6.68 | 286% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 18.40 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement