Ad is loading...
BKMBX vs FSLTX
BKMBX vs FSLTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BKMBX has more cash in the bank: 7.57B vs. FSLTX (3B). BKMBX pays higher dividends than FSLTX: BKMBX (4.07) vs FSLTX (3.34). BKMBX was incepted earlier than FSLTX: BKMBX (5 years) vs FSLTX (3 years). FSLTX (1.72) is less costly to investors than BKMBX (0.82). BKMBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 242.00 vs. FSLTX (106.00). FSLTX has a lower initial minimum investment than BKMBX: FSLTX (0) vs BKMBX (5000000). BKMBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.86 vs. FSLTX (4.69).
| BKMBX | FSLTX | BKMBX / FSLTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.47 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.72 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 3 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.874 | 1.865 | 154% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.57B | 3B | 252% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.07 | 3.34 | 122% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.86 | 4.69 | 146% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.00 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...