Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BKMBX vs FSLTX
BKMBX vs FSLTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BKMBX has more cash in the bank: 7.99B vs. FSLTX (2.54B). BKMBX (4.05) and FSLTX (3.97) have matching dividends . BKMBX was incepted earlier than FSLTX: BKMBX (5 years) vs FSLTX (3 years). FSLTX (1.81) is less costly to investors than BKMBX (0.82). BKMBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 242.00 vs. FSLTX (109.00). FSLTX has a lower initial minimum investment than BKMBX: FSLTX (0) vs BKMBX (5000000). FSLTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.77 vs. BKMBX (2.62).
| BKMBX | FSLTX | BKMBX / FSLTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.56 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.81 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 3 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.766 | 5.193 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.99B | 2.54B | 315% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.05 | 3.97 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.62 | 7.77 | 34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.56 | 12.35 | 150% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement