Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BKMBX vs WRPRX
BKMBX vs WRPRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BKMBX vs. WRPRX commentary
May 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BKMBX is a Hold and WRPRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BKMBX has more cash in the bank: 7.69B vs. WRPRX (101M). BKMBX pays higher dividends than WRPRX: BKMBX (4.05) vs WRPRX (3.47). BKMBX was incepted earlier than WRPRX: BKMBX (5 years) vs WRPRX (6 years). WRPRX (1.41) is less costly to investors than BKMBX (0.82). BKMBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 242.00 vs. WRPRX (0.00). WRPRX has a lower initial minimum investment than BKMBX: WRPRX (0) vs BKMBX (5000000). BKMBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.65 vs. WRPRX (3.03).
| BKMBX | WRPRX | BKMBX / WRPRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.64 | 128% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.41 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.973 | -3.369 | -88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.69B | 101M | 7,610% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.05 | 3.47 | 117% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.65 | 3.03 | 220% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.95 | 8.30 | 204% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 17.58 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement