Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BKMBX vs WRPRX
BKMBX vs WRPRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BKMBX vs. WRPRX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BKMBX is a Hold and WRPRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BKMBX has more cash in the bank: 7.76B vs. WRPRX (102M). BKMBX pays higher dividends than WRPRX: BKMBX (4.05) vs WRPRX (3.45). BKMBX was incepted earlier than WRPRX: BKMBX (5 years) vs WRPRX (6 years). WRPRX (1.41) is less costly to investors than BKMBX (0.82). BKMBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 242.00 vs. WRPRX (0.00). WRPRX has a lower initial minimum investment than BKMBX: WRPRX (0) vs BKMBX (5000000). BKMBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.33 vs. WRPRX (4.31).
| BKMBX | WRPRX | BKMBX / WRPRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.64 | 128% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.41 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.072 | -2.647 | -116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.76B | 102M | 7,611% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.05 | 3.45 | 117% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.33 | 4.31 | 147% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.11 | 3.51 | 516% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 20.08 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers