Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BKMIX vs FHLKX
BKMIX vs FHLKX Comparison
Open Charts BKMIX vs FHLKX
BlackRock Multi-Asset Income Portfolio K
Price$10.63
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.62B
Fidelity Health Savings K
Price$11.03
Change+$0.03 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets65.3M
BKMIX vs FHLKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BKMIX vs. FHLKX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BKMIX is a StrongBuy and FHLKX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BKMIX has more cash in the bank: 10.6B vs. FHLKX (65.3M). BKMIX pays higher dividends than FHLKX: BKMIX (5.86) vs FHLKX (2.71). BKMIX was incepted earlier than FHLKX: BKMIX (9 years) vs FHLKX (6 years). BKMIX (0.62) is less costly to investors than FHLKX (0.39). BKMIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. FHLKX (28.00). FHLKX has a lower initial minimum investment than BKMIX: FHLKX (0) vs BKMIX (5000000). FHLKX (8.94) and BKMIX (8.86) have marching annual gain over last year. BKMIX return over 5 years is better than : 29.32 vs. FHLKX (18.82).
| BKMIX | FHLKX | BKMIX / FHLKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.52 | 0.39 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.39 | 159% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.537 | 9.486 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.6B | 65.3M | 16,233% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.86 | 2.71 | 216% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.86 | 8.94 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.67 | 26.99 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.32 | 18.82 | 156% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement